I was recently enjoying my friend Sher's blog where she chronicled her top five posts of the year. It made me wonder what my top five posts for the year have been. They aren't what I expected. I thought my most visited post would be this one:
I Saw A Suicide Bombing in Istanbul Yesterday
but here they are in descending order of visits:
How the Czech Government Delighted Me as a Consumer
(about the Czech Republic's fabulous train service)
Futurista Builds Upon the Past
(about beautiful Czech design - the shop has since moved )
Starting My Third Year Without a Car
(this post is just a month old but wow, did it get traffic!)
The Legend of Starved Rock
(a last bit of Illinois tourism before I moved overseas)
Who Will be the Czech Jamie Oliver?
(my thoughts on Czech cuisine)
I have no idea why these posts resonated so if you have feedback for me on what were your favorite posts I would love to hear it! May you have a wonderful and prosperous 2011!
Friday, December 31, 2010
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Does the World Need the Opposite of a Nobel Peace Prize?
Do you remember when Ronald Reagan first declared the totalitarian Soviet Union an "evil empire?" Many citizens in the Soviet Union cite that moment as the one that caused them to really think about and question their own system.
"How could that be?" I wondered, "Everyone could see it was evil, why couldn't the people who actually live there? Why would it take an American President to make them stop and question something that was so obviously not working for participants and outsiders alike?"
Reagan said:
If people get delusional, it makes sense that countries and societies can get delusional too. They are just a giant collection of individual people. Indeed, there are delightful books written about economic self-delusion such as Tulipmania: The Story of the World's Most Coveted Flower & the Extraordinary Passions It Aroused. Another well-known form of personal delusion is addiction as described in the fiction bestseller A Million Little Pieces.
What could some national delusions be? How about:
Colonization?
Debt loads?
Empire?
Ethnic cleansing (World War II Germany and the Balkans and Rwanda more recently)?
Environmental degradation?
Hatred? (Middle Eastern attitudes toward Jewish People and European attitudes toward Roma)?
Extreme Paranoia and Societal Militarization (North Korea)?
Extreme Paranoia and Thugocracy? (Iran)
Nationalization of Property? (Soviet Union)
Non-Acceptance of Election Results? (Ivory Coast)
Extraordinary Corruption? (Afghanistan)
Extraordinary Use of Resources (United Arab Emirates and the United States)
Censorship and Lack of Free Expression (China)
What if someone with more credibility and less baggage than President Bush, a disinterested organization with a track record of caring, credibility, and leadership toward uplifting humanity gave the national equivalent of a 12-step intervention to a nation? A diplomatic call to "snap out of it!"
I propose that such a yearly intervention exist. Coming from the Nobel Committee, this yearly-awarded challenge could go to the country most needing a loving intervention and reminder that your fellow humans wish the best for you and think you can and should do better.
In order to let a nation know it needs to change, this intervention could be labeled not the Nobel Prize, but the Nobel Challenge. The Nobel Challenge would be the very classy national equivalent of friends and family sending an addict to rehab. Detox, please!
Even if countries go behind "an iron curtain," if the citizens have known about the prize beforehand and find out that their country has won the award, it becomes a kind of shorthand meaning "look long and hard at the direction your nation is headed. We, orignators of the award, "challenge" you because we think your nation is the one potentially endangering the peace of the world. It forces debate among citizens that can't be so easily dismissed and ignored.
The Nobel Challenge could be the sort of thing that seeps change into a country at the grassroots level. How can any one story in the media reach the North Korean people and give them the message "the entire world thinks you need a change." For all I know, the North Korean people know that better than we do. But do all the people of Iran? What seeps into the minds of the oppressed at the grass roots level? One big call to action might not only bring people to discuss change, but be empowered to create change.
Here's another example from my own culture where a society fails to recognize its own delusion. There were recently stories in the news that America and the United Arab Emirates consume electricity and water in huge quantities. The United Arab Emirates used four times as much water as Europe and four times as much electricity as the United States. These stories may have been noted for about 24 hours when they came out but most citizens of those countries would just yawn in indifference.What if the world, in the form of the Nobel Committee, said through the Nobel Challenge, "your use of resources is unsustainable, please change, your behaviour could create potential conflicts." First, my country would have a hissy fit, then we would get down to business and exceed whatever benchmark was given for change.
So how can humanity create change rather than yawning indifference to a long-term story? Think instead how the announcement of a Nobel Prize is treated. The tradition is institutionalized so journalists are prepared for the announcement and make sure to cover it in a significant way. It's a tradition that is highly anticipated around the world. It has a track record that people can discuss and debate. It has a meaning deeper than one particular year or person or organization. Instantly, when a Nobel Prize is announced, book clubs around the world read the works written by the author cited in the literature prize, for example, and think about the author's ideas and discuss what has been held up to the light by the prize.
Why even a totalitarian nation might have a hard time keeping that news from it's people no matter how hard it tried. It would be the equivalent of when an addict is confronted by all their family and all of their coworkers and the ability to "excuse" is stripped away. I recognize that defiance (one of the central hallmarks of an addict), may be the outcome of a dictator being challenged in this way, but the world has to shut him down sometime.
In George Orwell's "Animal Farm," it's when the pigs take the milk and apples from the other animals and the other animals notice and don't say anything that the abuse of power continues and increases. Orwell calls it the turning point of the story. When Chamberlain appeased Hitler with Czechoslovakia, same thing. Indeed, an ignored Nobel Challenge to someone like Saddam for the way he treated his citizens might have given George Bush some legitimacy for later intervention (I can't believe I just said that, I didn't believe in that military intervention one whit).
As the history of the Nobel Challenge built up, it might begin to have a preemptive performance effect before it is even given. Jack Welch, the CEO of GE chosen by Fortune Magazine as the "Manager of the Century", was famous for the performance he got out of his company (when he took over as CEO, revenues were $26.8 billion - when he left they were $130 billion). He had a rule that he would eliminate the bottom 10% of nonperforming staff every year. Can you imagine how extremely motivating it must have been to people to not be in that bottom 10%? Can you imagine how motivating it would be to not have your country ever receive a Nobel Challenge? It sounds cruel, but actual conflicts are crueler. Just read my previous blog post for a reminder.
All managers of any sort of human enterprise know that there is an entire emotional cycle to implementing change with all kinds of foot-dragging and noise by those who hate changing. The Nobel Challenge could be helpful in prodding those who love the status quo because it's the "devil they know." The world may have to absorb change at an even faster pace in the future.
If our species doesn't find a way to challenge the ever-expanding global abuses of power in a cost-effective, non-military way, could it be the turning point in our story?
"How could that be?" I wondered, "Everyone could see it was evil, why couldn't the people who actually live there? Why would it take an American President to make them stop and question something that was so obviously not working for participants and outsiders alike?"
Reagan said:
...I urge you to beware the temptation of pride, the temptation of blithely declaring yourselves above it all and label both sides equally at fault, to ignore the facts of history and the aggressive impulses of an evil empire, to simply call the arms race a giant misunderstanding and thereby remove yourself from the struggle between right and wrong and good and evil.President Bush tried to create the same effect of waking foreign citizens out of their denial by demanding Iran, Iraq, and North Korea end their "axis of evil." Unfortunately, President Bush seemed to be in his own self-delusion regarding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq at the time so it didn't quite have the intended effect. And it also didn't accurately reflect those three nations diplomatic actions. They weren't in a tri-part pact.
If people get delusional, it makes sense that countries and societies can get delusional too. They are just a giant collection of individual people. Indeed, there are delightful books written about economic self-delusion such as Tulipmania: The Story of the World's Most Coveted Flower & the Extraordinary Passions It Aroused. Another well-known form of personal delusion is addiction as described in the fiction bestseller A Million Little Pieces.
What could some national delusions be? How about:
Colonization?
Debt loads?
Empire?
Ethnic cleansing (World War II Germany and the Balkans and Rwanda more recently)?
Environmental degradation?
Hatred? (Middle Eastern attitudes toward Jewish People and European attitudes toward Roma)?
Extreme Paranoia and Societal Militarization (North Korea)?
Extreme Paranoia and Thugocracy? (Iran)
Nationalization of Property? (Soviet Union)
Non-Acceptance of Election Results? (Ivory Coast)
Extraordinary Corruption? (Afghanistan)
Extraordinary Use of Resources (United Arab Emirates and the United States)
Censorship and Lack of Free Expression (China)
What if someone with more credibility and less baggage than President Bush, a disinterested organization with a track record of caring, credibility, and leadership toward uplifting humanity gave the national equivalent of a 12-step intervention to a nation? A diplomatic call to "snap out of it!"
I propose that such a yearly intervention exist. Coming from the Nobel Committee, this yearly-awarded challenge could go to the country most needing a loving intervention and reminder that your fellow humans wish the best for you and think you can and should do better.
In order to let a nation know it needs to change, this intervention could be labeled not the Nobel Prize, but the Nobel Challenge. The Nobel Challenge would be the very classy national equivalent of friends and family sending an addict to rehab. Detox, please!
Even if countries go behind "an iron curtain," if the citizens have known about the prize beforehand and find out that their country has won the award, it becomes a kind of shorthand meaning "look long and hard at the direction your nation is headed. We, orignators of the award, "challenge" you because we think your nation is the one potentially endangering the peace of the world. It forces debate among citizens that can't be so easily dismissed and ignored.
The Nobel Challenge could be the sort of thing that seeps change into a country at the grassroots level. How can any one story in the media reach the North Korean people and give them the message "the entire world thinks you need a change." For all I know, the North Korean people know that better than we do. But do all the people of Iran? What seeps into the minds of the oppressed at the grass roots level? One big call to action might not only bring people to discuss change, but be empowered to create change.
Here's another example from my own culture where a society fails to recognize its own delusion. There were recently stories in the news that America and the United Arab Emirates consume electricity and water in huge quantities. The United Arab Emirates used four times as much water as Europe and four times as much electricity as the United States. These stories may have been noted for about 24 hours when they came out but most citizens of those countries would just yawn in indifference.What if the world, in the form of the Nobel Committee, said through the Nobel Challenge, "your use of resources is unsustainable, please change, your behaviour could create potential conflicts." First, my country would have a hissy fit, then we would get down to business and exceed whatever benchmark was given for change.
So how can humanity create change rather than yawning indifference to a long-term story? Think instead how the announcement of a Nobel Prize is treated. The tradition is institutionalized so journalists are prepared for the announcement and make sure to cover it in a significant way. It's a tradition that is highly anticipated around the world. It has a track record that people can discuss and debate. It has a meaning deeper than one particular year or person or organization. Instantly, when a Nobel Prize is announced, book clubs around the world read the works written by the author cited in the literature prize, for example, and think about the author's ideas and discuss what has been held up to the light by the prize.
Why even a totalitarian nation might have a hard time keeping that news from it's people no matter how hard it tried. It would be the equivalent of when an addict is confronted by all their family and all of their coworkers and the ability to "excuse" is stripped away. I recognize that defiance (one of the central hallmarks of an addict), may be the outcome of a dictator being challenged in this way, but the world has to shut him down sometime.
In George Orwell's "Animal Farm," it's when the pigs take the milk and apples from the other animals and the other animals notice and don't say anything that the abuse of power continues and increases. Orwell calls it the turning point of the story. When Chamberlain appeased Hitler with Czechoslovakia, same thing. Indeed, an ignored Nobel Challenge to someone like Saddam for the way he treated his citizens might have given George Bush some legitimacy for later intervention (I can't believe I just said that, I didn't believe in that military intervention one whit).
As the history of the Nobel Challenge built up, it might begin to have a preemptive performance effect before it is even given. Jack Welch, the CEO of GE chosen by Fortune Magazine as the "Manager of the Century", was famous for the performance he got out of his company (when he took over as CEO, revenues were $26.8 billion - when he left they were $130 billion). He had a rule that he would eliminate the bottom 10% of nonperforming staff every year. Can you imagine how extremely motivating it must have been to people to not be in that bottom 10%? Can you imagine how motivating it would be to not have your country ever receive a Nobel Challenge? It sounds cruel, but actual conflicts are crueler. Just read my previous blog post for a reminder.
All managers of any sort of human enterprise know that there is an entire emotional cycle to implementing change with all kinds of foot-dragging and noise by those who hate changing. The Nobel Challenge could be helpful in prodding those who love the status quo because it's the "devil they know." The world may have to absorb change at an even faster pace in the future.
If our species doesn't find a way to challenge the ever-expanding global abuses of power in a cost-effective, non-military way, could it be the turning point in our story?
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
WWII was worse for Central Europe than even our histories and memories tell us
Sometimes reading about the evil of the Holocaust it seems so over-the-top that it's all one can do to take in the enormity of all of the killing and dehumanizing that went on in the concentration camps. Try to imagine this though, it's even worse than everyone thought.
Anne Applebaum, writing in the New York Review of Books, in an essay called "The Worst of the Madness" says that the camps may be the predominant preserved historical artifact of carnage. but much worse carnage occurred elsewhere, for example, in the killing fields of Central Europe. Those killings are less likely to be officially commemorated, remembered, or written about [probably because there is nothing to look at like photos or an actual camp].
Ms. Applebaum also argues that with two dictators, Hitler and Stalin, operating ruthlessly in the Central European theater, it accelerated and exacerbated the carnage of the other. The author argues that each side should expand their notion of guilt of what deaths they may have caused.
She says even the United States can't walk away from revising our notion of participation. That we weren't involved in just a "Good War" as Americans like to think of it. She suggests it was more morally ambiguous because Central Europe and the East were left to experience 45 years of totalitarianism.
I found that hard to take because I think Americans would have loved to liberate to the east of Pilsen, but deferred to the Soviets in thanks for their help. It's true that we Americans would probably never imagine an entire region of the world getting walled off and it's inhabitants being treated like prisoners. As an American of the next generation, reading about it all just increases my respect for all of those in Central Europe that coped, and perished, due to "The Worst of the Madness."
Thanks to David Brooks, opinion writer for the New York Times, for alerting me to this magazine essay. He chose it as one of the best of 2010.
Anne Applebaum, writing in the New York Review of Books, in an essay called "The Worst of the Madness" says that the camps may be the predominant preserved historical artifact of carnage. but much worse carnage occurred elsewhere, for example, in the killing fields of Central Europe. Those killings are less likely to be officially commemorated, remembered, or written about [probably because there is nothing to look at like photos or an actual camp].
Ms. Applebaum also argues that with two dictators, Hitler and Stalin, operating ruthlessly in the Central European theater, it accelerated and exacerbated the carnage of the other. The author argues that each side should expand their notion of guilt of what deaths they may have caused.
She says even the United States can't walk away from revising our notion of participation. That we weren't involved in just a "Good War" as Americans like to think of it. She suggests it was more morally ambiguous because Central Europe and the East were left to experience 45 years of totalitarianism.
I found that hard to take because I think Americans would have loved to liberate to the east of Pilsen, but deferred to the Soviets in thanks for their help. It's true that we Americans would probably never imagine an entire region of the world getting walled off and it's inhabitants being treated like prisoners. As an American of the next generation, reading about it all just increases my respect for all of those in Central Europe that coped, and perished, due to "The Worst of the Madness."
Thanks to David Brooks, opinion writer for the New York Times, for alerting me to this magazine essay. He chose it as one of the best of 2010.
Thursday, December 23, 2010
St. Clement's Anglican English-Speaking Church Services will be broadcast globally this Christmas on BBC Radio 4
You've heard that Christmas carol about ''Good King Wenceslas,'' right? Well who was he? The Czechs know but everyone else could probably use a little background. My beloved church community in old town Prague has had the great honor to be selected by BBC Radio 4 to broadcast a program about the life and death of St Stephen and also of Wenceslas, tenth century Duke of Bohemia, who became known as St Vaclav, patron saint of the Czech Republic.
Would you like to hear it yourself on Sunday, December 26th? It will be available online at 08.10 GMT (9.10 CET in the Czech Republic) and you can also listen to it anytime in the next seven days after that.
I'm so proud to see my friend and pastor Ricky Yates be honored this way and so happy more people will discover this wonderful community of people who gather weekly from all over the world to worship in Prague.
Merry Christmas!
Would you like to hear it yourself on Sunday, December 26th? It will be available online at 08.10 GMT (9.10 CET in the Czech Republic) and you can also listen to it anytime in the next seven days after that.
I'm so proud to see my friend and pastor Ricky Yates be honored this way and so happy more people will discover this wonderful community of people who gather weekly from all over the world to worship in Prague.
Merry Christmas!
Friday, December 17, 2010
Celebrating Those Who Celebrate the Best In Humanity
2010 Nobel Peace Prize Winner Liu Xiaobo (right)
and his wife Liu Xia (left)
Last week about this time I was watching the live coverage of the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony. Did you happen to catch it? It was moving. Apparently CNN International does a live interview with the recipient immediately after they receive their prize. China did not allow this year's recipient, a Chinese citizen, to travel to Oslo to receive his prize (note to Communist Central Committees - anytime your decision puts you and Adolf Hitler in the same historical footnote, you might want to consider alternative viewpoints before making the final call).
CNN International was left to use their entire Nobel Peace Prize interview hour to discuss with various people what human rights are like in China. If you were watching, like me, did you come to the same conclusion that all of us really know nothing of what is going on in China?
CNN International mentioned that the People's Republic employs 50,000 people just to keep the Internet censored at all times. It made me think about how many goods I purchase from China (especially since every country's manufacturing seems to have been farmed out there) and how little these purchases reflect my values if they are being manufactured in a tolitarian state. The first step in addressing a problem is awareness.
It impressed me that despite all of its economic power, the majority of the world would not be bullied into ignoring the ceremony based on China's demands. It impressed me that Norway is charged with administering the Nobel Peace Prize because Alfred Nobel admired that Norway had never declared war on another country (check out their wealth indicators - peace pays). It impressed me that such a tiny, little country has found a way to capture the world's imagination, to get people like me to slow down for an afternoon, and to consider where we as a species are going. Norway, there is nothing small about your ideas.
To honor the Norweigan people for their ability to be the thought leaders of the world on the subject of peace, I want to do my small part today and share something I never heard of or read until I moved to Europe. It is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights created by the United Nations 61 years ago.
Get a cup of coffee, take a few moments, and ask yourself if your country measures up on every article. Did you even know this Declaration existed? Did you even know that some of these items were your rights as a human being as decided by the peoples of the Earth? Were you surprised by any of the human rights declared? I was surprised by Article 16, the whole section on marriage and family.
How can we as individuals move our global leaders closer to honoring these rights rather than ignoring them? Do you feel your own country is delivering on these globally universal human rights?
Friday, December 10, 2010
Heda Kovaly, Czech Who Wrote of Totalitarianism, Is Dead at 91
People of a certain age in the Czech Republic have had the misfortune of experiencing the full blast of the worst of the 20th century. The Czech Republic was occupied by the Nazis longer than any other country. Quickly after the nightmare ended, years and years of gray totalitarianism started.
While I have not read this author, I can't help but read her obituary and be impressed by her dignity, her humanity, and her sheer ability to survive. Here's what the New York Times reviewer had to say about her book looking back on the worst of totalitarianism in Central Europe:
“This is an extraordinary memoir, so heartbreaking that I have reread it for months, unable to rise to the business of ‘reviewing’ less a book than a life repeatedly outraged by the worst totalitarians in Europe. Yet it is written with so much quiet respect for the minutiae of justice and truth that one does not know where and how to specify Heda Kovaly’s splendidness as a human being.”
Take a moment to click on my title and read about the life of Heda Kovaly, author of ''Under a Cruel Star.''
While I have not read this author, I can't help but read her obituary and be impressed by her dignity, her humanity, and her sheer ability to survive. Here's what the New York Times reviewer had to say about her book looking back on the worst of totalitarianism in Central Europe:
Take a moment to click on my title and read about the life of Heda Kovaly, author of ''Under a Cruel Star.''
Monday, December 6, 2010
Starting My Third Year Without a Car
I sold my beloved Saturn red coupe the month before I left to go overseas. A Saturn was the perfect car for a woman to own because it was possible to buy the car without negotiation and to pay for three years of maintenance up front. Saturn's innovation was pricing the product visiably so buyers didn't feel that it was a contest with the car salesman to see who could 'best' the other in deciding on a price.
As a Saturn car owner, all I had to do was drive the car into the dealership every 3,000 miles to get the oil changed. My favorable opinion must not have been universally held because the Saturn brand went bankrupt a year after I sold my car. Even loving the car as I had, I didn't appreciate how much nicer life is without one.
Moving to Prague, I was able to enjoy a very simple, cost-effective transportation system at the low cost price of $22 a month. This enabled me to have a wonderful quality of life because I could easily go home for lunch from most places in the city and I didn't have to devote any of my time to gassing up, car washes, or getting my vehicle maintained. I also didn't have to devote my time to being stuck in traffic because public transportation always had a dedicated lane, metro tube, or tram track. Better yet, I no longer needed to earn the money necessary to own a car. This opened up more free time.
I have lived in two subsequent cities since then: Madison, Wisconsin in the United States and Istanbul, Turkey. In both places, public transportation works just fine and a car is superfluous. I never want to go back to spending money on something I don't actually value!
When I get in a car now as a passenger (a very rare occurrence) I'm always struck by the stress that the driver is experiencing. I am thrilled to give up that need for control and have the freedom and lack of stress created by leaving the driving to others.
I would never have learned this without moving to another culture because my own consumer culture constantly reinforces that I should own a car.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
