Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Turkish Government issues list of 138 forbidden words on websites
Wow, if I wasn't having problems enough getting around the Turkish censorship of Google's blogging platform (the censorship hasn't stopped in my area but it has been lifted intermittently in other locations around Turkey), news comes today that Turkey is going to ban any website with 138 different words. One of the first on the list is "passionate." I guess that would rule out the discussion we expats had this weekend over at Displaced Nation about the Royal Wedding and the institution of Monarchy. The moderating bloggers chose to title the post: "Two writers with passionate views of Royal Passion." They probably didn't know that it would keep a potential 70 million people in Turkey from reading it! If you want to write about being "blonde," "overweight," or making "homemade" cookies, you are also out of luck at reaching a Turkish audience. Click on my title to see what else is censored.
Labels:
blogging,
censorship,
monarchy,
Turkey
Sunday, May 1, 2011
What Did You Think of the Royal Wedding?
The Royal Kiss
Photo and links were added at a later date due to Turkey's ongoing censorship of bloggers.
Labels:
Britain,
expat,
fashion report,
monarchy,
Sweden
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Religion will be 'nearly extinct' in the Czech Republic by 2050
The Czech Republic is already the most atheist nation on Earth. Mathematicians and scientists are predicting that the Czech Republic will become even more atheist, and that by 2050, religion will have virtually died out in the Czech lands and in eight other European countries. The exact same modeling program used to predict the death of languages is being used to predict the death of belief. You can click on my title to read the article from the Prague Post.
It's hard to know if Czechs believe in anything because their sense of humor is so black. I would often tease my Czech friends that they would be completely skeptical when their spouse said "I love you," because Czech people believe no one in authority on anything! What do Czech people believe in?!?
A nation of atheists was planted when the Catholic Pope rejected Czech requests for Mass to be delivered in native Czech instead of Latin more than 100 years ago. The Pope should have learned from the history of Saints Cyril and Methodius (two Byzantine priests from Constantinople) who translated the Bible into Slavic languages so the Czech people could learn it in their own tongue. Cyril and Methodius even created an alphabet for Slavic languages to make translation of the Bible easier.
During the Czech National Revival, if being told they couldn't worship in their own language wasn't enough to drive religion out of Czechs, later in the 20th century, the Communists then further drummed religion out of them.
When I moved to Turkey, I could feel the difference in religious belief immediately. Maybe the most visual way of seeing it was a conservatism among people on the street. I saw no public display of affection anywhere and of course, Muslim dress in its varied forms. I also felt my possessions were completely safe on the Istanbul streets. I felt completely safe leaving my consumer electronics not locked up at work because I was 100% sure they would not get stolen. But it was more than that.
Comparing societies, I'll quote my former President. Bill Clinton says the United States has gotten away from being a "people-centered society & become a money-centered society." Sadly, I agree with him completely. In America, I would say you can literally feel America's predominant religion and values are "commerce," in the Czech lands the dominant religion is none, and in Turkey I would say the dominant religion is, actually, religion.
Upon my arrival, it stunned me is that I found Turkey's spirituality refreshing. After all, they practice a different religion than me! It was refreshing because the values came from the people themselves. The values in the public square have not been overrun by corporate salesmanship that degraded all things sacred in pursuit of selling something.
My Turkish friends cite the Jesus cage match on the TV show "South Park" as evidence that we in the West hold nothing sacred. It is completely fair criticism. I see evidence everyday that "The People" are still dictating the values here, not the corporations and the people who create for them.
When the Muslim World doesn't like something the West does, rather than rail against someone exercising their free speech (a value the West holds so deeply it could and would never give it up), they would create more thought and changed behavior with the question "is there nothing you hold sacred?" It's a question that isn't asked enough in my Western culture.
Now what will the Czech lands do with all those spectacular baroque churches? And what will a nation without belief be like? What will Czech people hold sacred?
It's hard to know if Czechs believe in anything because their sense of humor is so black. I would often tease my Czech friends that they would be completely skeptical when their spouse said "I love you," because Czech people believe no one in authority on anything! What do Czech people believe in?!?
A nation of atheists was planted when the Catholic Pope rejected Czech requests for Mass to be delivered in native Czech instead of Latin more than 100 years ago. The Pope should have learned from the history of Saints Cyril and Methodius (two Byzantine priests from Constantinople) who translated the Bible into Slavic languages so the Czech people could learn it in their own tongue. Cyril and Methodius even created an alphabet for Slavic languages to make translation of the Bible easier.
During the Czech National Revival, if being told they couldn't worship in their own language wasn't enough to drive religion out of Czechs, later in the 20th century, the Communists then further drummed religion out of them.
When I moved to Turkey, I could feel the difference in religious belief immediately. Maybe the most visual way of seeing it was a conservatism among people on the street. I saw no public display of affection anywhere and of course, Muslim dress in its varied forms. I also felt my possessions were completely safe on the Istanbul streets. I felt completely safe leaving my consumer electronics not locked up at work because I was 100% sure they would not get stolen. But it was more than that.
Comparing societies, I'll quote my former President. Bill Clinton says the United States has gotten away from being a "people-centered society & become a money-centered society." Sadly, I agree with him completely. In America, I would say you can literally feel America's predominant religion and values are "commerce," in the Czech lands the dominant religion is none, and in Turkey I would say the dominant religion is, actually, religion.
Upon my arrival, it stunned me is that I found Turkey's spirituality refreshing. After all, they practice a different religion than me! It was refreshing because the values came from the people themselves. The values in the public square have not been overrun by corporate salesmanship that degraded all things sacred in pursuit of selling something.
My Turkish friends cite the Jesus cage match on the TV show "South Park" as evidence that we in the West hold nothing sacred. It is completely fair criticism. I see evidence everyday that "The People" are still dictating the values here, not the corporations and the people who create for them.
When the Muslim World doesn't like something the West does, rather than rail against someone exercising their free speech (a value the West holds so deeply it could and would never give it up), they would create more thought and changed behavior with the question "is there nothing you hold sacred?" It's a question that isn't asked enough in my Western culture.
Now what will the Czech lands do with all those spectacular baroque churches? And what will a nation without belief be like? What will Czech people hold sacred?
Friday, April 22, 2011
Prague's Anglican Minister: The Reverend Ricky Yates
Happy Good Friday readers! Today I was delighted to see my pastor in Prague, Chaplain Ricky Yates of St. Clement's Anglican Church, properly written up in the Prague Post and recognized for his work serving the English-speaking expat community in Prague.
Regular readers of my blog know how incredibly tight-knight I found the expat church community at St. Clement's and how Pastor Ricky was there for me and my friend Anna when we got in a tight spot with our visas. I simply can't say enough about the community of people there and his leadership of us. Click on my title to read the whole article. You can also look to the right of this post and see the link for Ricky's blog. Best of all though, if you're in Prague, head on down to the church on a Sunday morning at 11 a.m. to tell him hello yourself. You'll be glad you did.
Regular readers of my blog know how incredibly tight-knight I found the expat church community at St. Clement's and how Pastor Ricky was there for me and my friend Anna when we got in a tight spot with our visas. I simply can't say enough about the community of people there and his leadership of us. Click on my title to read the whole article. You can also look to the right of this post and see the link for Ricky's blog. Best of all though, if you're in Prague, head on down to the church on a Sunday morning at 11 a.m. to tell him hello yourself. You'll be glad you did.
Monday, April 18, 2011
The Czech President Pockets A Pen
President Klaus brought home a great souvenir of his State Visit to Chile. Click on my title to watch the video. Five million people have already sought it out and watched it!
Labels:
Czech culture,
Czech people,
Czech Republic,
Vaclav Klaus
Saturday, April 16, 2011
Europe Takes Note as Norway Smashes Through the Glass Ceiling
I guess I'm just not ready to let go of my admiration for Scandinavian thought leadership.
In 2010, my travels really taught me how America lags the world in female representation in government and industry. America is currently ranked 85th in the world for elected female leadership. Yes, America, that wasn't a typo. It was an 8 and then a 5 to make us 85th out of 195 countries in the world. Mediocre.
Deutsche-Welle, the German media company, has published a story that reminds me while American women are talking a good game, other women are actually making gender diversity happen.
Norwegian women have "smashed through the glass ceiling." How? By getting their government to tie corporate board gender diversity to a company's ability to be competitive for a government contract or listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange. Well played, ladies. I admire your obvious business acumen in executing global leadership in gender equity. Kudos also belong to the chivalrous conservative male politician in Norway who introduced the legislation.
American women, there is hope. Less than a decade ago, Norwegian women were represented in only 7% of their corporate board seats. We could turn this around by following their lead. If not, we're slated to fall even further behind as the rest of Europe adopts measures similar to the Norwegians. The American Dream, if you're female, might be more-likely found in Europe.
Click on my title to read the article.
Labels:
American culture,
European Union,
Norway,
parlimentary politics,
politics,
sexism
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Empty Next Expat Chosen as a Top Expat Blog by Tripbase
For a second year in a row, 'Empty Nest Expat' has been chosen as one of the best expat blogs in the world by Tripbase. I even moved up a spot on the list. The Tripbase staff hand picked blogs among many choices in many different categories. I am thrilled to be recognized for a second time!
This is a tough year for me to blog because between trying to stay in the Czech Republic and now getting censored in Turkey, it's just flat out hard to sustain blogging! For example, I can't even physically see my blog to see how the layout looks so I hope their award badge looks ok. I appreciate you, gentle reader, coming back when I go awhile without a post due to no stable living spot or no access to my blog. Sometimes I think that's the secret of my readership, I'm not always reporting how everything is going swimmingly because a lot of the times it is not.
I also love when you leave me comments! I wish I could reply to them presently, but I haven't yet figured out how to put up a reply comment through my secret blogging back door that gets around the Turkish censors. So please know I'm happy you're here. Thanks for reading "Empty Nest Expat' and making it one of Tripbase's "Top Expat Blogs." Click on my title for their original press release.
This is a tough year for me to blog because between trying to stay in the Czech Republic and now getting censored in Turkey, it's just flat out hard to sustain blogging! For example, I can't even physically see my blog to see how the layout looks so I hope their award badge looks ok. I appreciate you, gentle reader, coming back when I go awhile without a post due to no stable living spot or no access to my blog. Sometimes I think that's the secret of my readership, I'm not always reporting how everything is going swimmingly because a lot of the times it is not.
I also love when you leave me comments! I wish I could reply to them presently, but I haven't yet figured out how to put up a reply comment through my secret blogging back door that gets around the Turkish censors. So please know I'm happy you're here. Thanks for reading "Empty Nest Expat' and making it one of Tripbase's "Top Expat Blogs." Click on my title for their original press release.
Saturday, April 2, 2011
This Blog is Censored in Turkey
Tap, tap, tap. Is this thing on? I'm not sure. Because I can't physically see my blog. You'll have to tell me if you can. I'm physically prevented from seeing what I write here so I hope you can read it. I just now figured out how to get a post on my blog through a blogging "back door."
I haven't posted in over a month. That hasn't happened in the three years I've been writing this blog because there has been so much I've wanted to share in my traveling adventure.
As many of you know, I moved to Istanbul, Turkey last summer and have thoroughly enjoyed myself here. I'm a bit behind in blogging about my adventures because well, a move is disruptive, and time-consuming. Turkey itself is a fantastically-interesting country with incredible history and beauty. I can't wait to tell you about it!
Right now, however, my blog and any other bloggers using Google's Blogspot domain are being censored in Turkey. The story printed in the papers was that one person was illegally streaming football matches over his blog and a judge ordered not just his blog shut down, but the entire domain! Blogspot gets 18 million hits a month in this country alone. I sincerely hope you aren't a Turkish person trying to run a business on your blog cause you've been out of luck for over a month now. I can't even imagine how frustrating that would be!
Now I'm American so I don't know much about football. I've watched one game in my life, the final of the World Cup, and it was enough to convince me that I don't need to know too much more about football. Yawn! Geez, it's slow. But a game is over in one afternoon, right? I have no idea why this censorship continues. One of my American friends said, "well, maybe that guy wasn't streaming a football game, but a cricket match. Those go on for weeks, right?"
So here we bloggers sit. Still censored. Maybe it's because I'm a librarian and we librarians are constantly making sure the public has access to banned books. Maybe it's because I spent so much time in formerly-Communist Prague and I find the idea of repressed society unable to express their opinions so compelling and worthy of my advocacy.
The effect of this banning was annoying at first, but now it's starting to feed my ego. I never would have thought to put "being censored" on my bucket list, but hey, now I can cross it off the list as "done! Been there, done that, bought the T-shirt" What could we all have to say that merits this silence? Why, I do believe my blog is samizdat (the Russian name for literature that doesn't have the official seal of approval so it has to be self-published)! How wonderfully romantic. The librarian in my loves the idea of "Banned in the 'Bul!" Somebody ought to make T-shirts and sell them.
Another thing the librarian in me is giggling at: I'm not the one doing the shushing here!
I haven't posted in over a month. That hasn't happened in the three years I've been writing this blog because there has been so much I've wanted to share in my traveling adventure.
As many of you know, I moved to Istanbul, Turkey last summer and have thoroughly enjoyed myself here. I'm a bit behind in blogging about my adventures because well, a move is disruptive, and time-consuming. Turkey itself is a fantastically-interesting country with incredible history and beauty. I can't wait to tell you about it!
Right now, however, my blog and any other bloggers using Google's Blogspot domain are being censored in Turkey. The story printed in the papers was that one person was illegally streaming football matches over his blog and a judge ordered not just his blog shut down, but the entire domain! Blogspot gets 18 million hits a month in this country alone. I sincerely hope you aren't a Turkish person trying to run a business on your blog cause you've been out of luck for over a month now. I can't even imagine how frustrating that would be!
Now I'm American so I don't know much about football. I've watched one game in my life, the final of the World Cup, and it was enough to convince me that I don't need to know too much more about football. Yawn! Geez, it's slow. But a game is over in one afternoon, right? I have no idea why this censorship continues. One of my American friends said, "well, maybe that guy wasn't streaming a football game, but a cricket match. Those go on for weeks, right?"
So here we bloggers sit. Still censored. Maybe it's because I'm a librarian and we librarians are constantly making sure the public has access to banned books. Maybe it's because I spent so much time in formerly-Communist Prague and I find the idea of repressed society unable to express their opinions so compelling and worthy of my advocacy.
The effect of this banning was annoying at first, but now it's starting to feed my ego. I never would have thought to put "being censored" on my bucket list, but hey, now I can cross it off the list as "done! Been there, done that, bought the T-shirt" What could we all have to say that merits this silence? Why, I do believe my blog is samizdat (the Russian name for literature that doesn't have the official seal of approval so it has to be self-published)! How wonderfully romantic. The librarian in my loves the idea of "Banned in the 'Bul!" Somebody ought to make T-shirts and sell them.
Another thing the librarian in me is giggling at: I'm not the one doing the shushing here!
Labels:
blogging,
censorship,
communism,
expat,
samizdat,
transition,
Turkey
Monday, February 28, 2011
If It Were My Home: Comparing Sweden to the United States
In my final post about Sweden, I'd like to share a wonderful Internet site that appeals to the geeky librarian in me for its beautiful presentation of data and ease of understanding for the reader. This site is called ''If It Were My Home.'' It allows readers to compare two countries side-by-side. I'm glad to see the instincts telling me Sweden is outperforming the United States were correct. I wish I was wrong, alas, no.
The only category where we are outperforming Sweden is in income. Given that our wealth is at the top, and Sweden is 25% immigrants, it feels much wealthier than America when you're there.
Click on my title to go to the real site with extensive informatıon. Compare any two countries you want! Wouldn't it be cool if our countries felt competitive with each other about their statistical performance and started to compete on performance on our behalf?
Related posts:
There Is No Need to Save Face In Sweden
If This Is Socialism, Sign Me Up!
What Idea(s) Captured Your Imagination in 2010?
The Swedish Tourist Attraction That Didn't Attract Me
The only category where we are outperforming Sweden is in income. Given that our wealth is at the top, and Sweden is 25% immigrants, it feels much wealthier than America when you're there.
Click on my title to go to the real site with extensive informatıon. Compare any two countries you want! Wouldn't it be cool if our countries felt competitive with each other about their statistical performance and started to compete on performance on our behalf?
Related posts:
There Is No Need to Save Face In Sweden
If This Is Socialism, Sign Me Up!
What Idea(s) Captured Your Imagination in 2010?
The Swedish Tourist Attraction That Didn't Attract Me
Labels:
American culture,
politics,
Sweden
Monday, February 14, 2011
Visiting Sweden: If This is Socialism, Sign Me Up!
Sweden wowed me when I visited for one week last November. I was stunned by the general prosperıty of the population, and to be honest, I didn't quite understand it. For example, I spent time in Örebro, the 7th largest city in Sweden. It's the same size as a city I lived in America whose downtown had been hollowed out and decimated by the move of manufacturing from America to China. Why hasn't Sweden had the same trouble competing?
In Örebro, every downtown shop was rented and many were selling magnificent fashion. There was one fashion boutique after another. Imagine the best brands: Hugo Boss, Ralph Lauren, Burberry, etc. all being on offer in the downtown of an American manufacturing town. I can't. I could only assume the wealth hadn't 'trickled up' enough to move out-of-town.
I couldn't take my eyes off of Swedish old people over the age of 70. I wish I had thought to take pictures. Swedish old people are aging beautifully. I saw person after person looking 10 to 15 years younger than their actual age. The Swedish universal health care system meant that the entire population was better cared for their whole life and they must have had the faces and bodies and teeth and health they deserved. Not only did the old folks look great they were dressed fashionably in stylish clothes. As I was chatting up one older gentleman in Sweden who told me he was seventy, he said with a mischievous twinkle "yes, but if I start speaking French, I'm a mere 60!"
Human beings aren't the only part of Sweden that looks great. So does the land. In Turkey, every ounce of topsoil and all the trees are gone from my neck of the woods - quite understandable given 8,000 years of continuous civilization. In Sweden, the forests went on for miles and miles and the air and water were very clean. Swedes say they are very lucky because they didn't pay the price other European countries did during WWII, but they aren't giving themselves enough credit for being incredible stewards of the environment.
When I would compliment Swedes on their nation, I would hear "oh, but we have terrible problems with income inequality [the link shows they really don't, at least compared to everyone else, Swedes must be comparing internally]. Plus, it gets dark too early in the day and it is cold." Now would a statement like that about income inequality come out of an American's mouth? I don't think we would even think such a thought. Yet, our nation has more income equality than at any time since 1928.
I didn't actually get to see this but a friend in Stockholm told me there was an extensive series of tunnels underneath the City of Stockholm so that no neighborhood had to have a multi-lane highway going through it. Just the idea of being willing to spend tax money on underground highways so as to not impose that on anyone (in America, above-ground multi-lane highways would get imposed on poor neighborhoods) stunned me.
Visiting Sweden I couldn't help but think of American intellectual Cornell West. He has a phrase for our current American experience: "we have become well-adjusted to injustice." If Sweden represents the socialism that is so often derided back home in America, sign me up!
Related posts:
A Week in Sweden
There is No Need to Save Face in Sweden
Daydreaming at Stockholm City Hall
Visiting the Nobel Museum
The Swedish Tourist Attraction that Didn't Attract Me
In Örebro, every downtown shop was rented and many were selling magnificent fashion. There was one fashion boutique after another. Imagine the best brands: Hugo Boss, Ralph Lauren, Burberry, etc. all being on offer in the downtown of an American manufacturing town. I can't. I could only assume the wealth hadn't 'trickled up' enough to move out-of-town.
Surely I would find poverty in the public library.
Where are the homeless people
trying to stay warm?
They weren't sitting in the cafe
all day either
Wait...nope just a sculpture.
I went into the public library of Örebro to count how many homeless people I could see. If it matched a downtown library of an American manufacturing city on an equally frosty day, I would estimate in advance, that there would be about 20 homeless people. I couldn't find one. NOT ONE! I went through every nook and cranny of that library too from the top floor to the basement.I couldn't take my eyes off of Swedish old people over the age of 70. I wish I had thought to take pictures. Swedish old people are aging beautifully. I saw person after person looking 10 to 15 years younger than their actual age. The Swedish universal health care system meant that the entire population was better cared for their whole life and they must have had the faces and bodies and teeth and health they deserved. Not only did the old folks look great they were dressed fashionably in stylish clothes. As I was chatting up one older gentleman in Sweden who told me he was seventy, he said with a mischievous twinkle "yes, but if I start speaking French, I'm a mere 60!"
Human beings aren't the only part of Sweden that looks great. So does the land. In Turkey, every ounce of topsoil and all the trees are gone from my neck of the woods - quite understandable given 8,000 years of continuous civilization. In Sweden, the forests went on for miles and miles and the air and water were very clean. Swedes say they are very lucky because they didn't pay the price other European countries did during WWII, but they aren't giving themselves enough credit for being incredible stewards of the environment.
When I would compliment Swedes on their nation, I would hear "oh, but we have terrible problems with income inequality [the link shows they really don't, at least compared to everyone else, Swedes must be comparing internally]. Plus, it gets dark too early in the day and it is cold." Now would a statement like that about income inequality come out of an American's mouth? I don't think we would even think such a thought. Yet, our nation has more income equality than at any time since 1928.
I didn't actually get to see this but a friend in Stockholm told me there was an extensive series of tunnels underneath the City of Stockholm so that no neighborhood had to have a multi-lane highway going through it. Just the idea of being willing to spend tax money on underground highways so as to not impose that on anyone (in America, above-ground multi-lane highways would get imposed on poor neighborhoods) stunned me.
Visiting Sweden I couldn't help but think of American intellectual Cornell West. He has a phrase for our current American experience: "we have become well-adjusted to injustice." If Sweden represents the socialism that is so often derided back home in America, sign me up!
Related posts:
A Week in Sweden
There is No Need to Save Face in Sweden
Daydreaming at Stockholm City Hall
Visiting the Nobel Museum
The Swedish Tourist Attraction that Didn't Attract Me
Monday, February 7, 2011
What Idea(s) Captured Your Imagination in 2010?
The idea that really captured and shocked my imagination in 2010 was this: American women are not progressing politically as I would have expected in the early 21st Century. We currently rank 85th in the world for female representation. 85th!
African-Americans, after all, can rightly celebrate political progress. One hundred years after the founding of the NAACP, and 40 years after the civil rights era, America has a black President.
What about the progress of American women? Lulled by Hillary Clinton’s success in garnering 18 million votes for the Presidency and the addition of two new Supreme Court Justices, I hadn’t actually kept up with how far we as American woman have to go to equal the gains of women everywhere else in the world.
Out of 13,000 members of Congress
in our history,
only 2%
have been women.
~Name It, Change It.
Two things raised my consciousness in 2010. The first was a brand new organization founded by Gloria Steinem and Jane Fonda called ‘Name It, Change It’ that points out sexism toward female candidates in the media. I have written here about the stunning effect of seeing America’s media-generated sexism gathered and catalogued on a daily basis. It’s shocking.
If you are an American feminist of either gender, I’d like to ask you to join me in changing the world by “liking” this organization through Facebook. It has taught me a lot. There are still less than 1,460 people who “like” this group. You would be among the cutting-edge politically by doing so. Both my conservative and liberal friends have signed up and been shocked by how dismissively their female candidates have been treated.
Only 31 women
have ever served as Governor
compared with 2,317 men.
~Name It, Change It.
Here’s an example of what they taught me: scholar J.A. Schmitz's wrote an article highlighted through the website that pointed out that America’s system will not result in equal representation for females anytime soon. Why? Because our system is set up to give incumbents an advantage in reelection. Since 90% of incumbents are men, women are at an obvious disadvantage that could take years and years to overcome.
The beautiful Stockholm City Hall
Council Chambers
Being an expat has also allowed me to compare the American system with other countries' systems. When I was in Sweden, I asked the Swedish tour guide at Stockholm’s City Hall, “why is it your country has made such incredible progress in electing women?”
My Swedish tour guide told me, “what I have always been told is that in a system that directly elects representatives such as America’s, it practically requires millionaire-status to run for federal office. Because most women are devoting their prime years to running their families rather than making money, most millionaires happen to men. In Sweden, a parliamentary system favors those who do the work. Hence, more females are chosen and elected as representatives of their party.”
Parliamentary systems such as Sweden also lend themselves to quota systems that ensure more female representation. While women are just as underrepresented in cabinet offices in Iraq as American women, their new constitution requires political parties to fill quotas for female representation. I don’t believe in quotas, but I can’t help but think that this minimum level of female representation will be good for women and children in Iraq.
I'll admit, I’m discouraged by what I learned. I thought we would be farther by now. I had no idea how much farther we have to go.
What ideas have captured your imagination in 2010?
Related Posts:
Friday, February 4, 2011
The Swedish Tourist Attraction That Didn't Attract Me
During my week in Sweden, I could tell one aspect of Swedish culture that had wide appreciation among Swedes and foreigners alike was the Swedish monarchy. Recently, there was a royal wedding between the beautiful Princess Victoria and her physical fitness trainer Daniel Westling. Reportedly, their relationship was quite a love story warming the hearts of all lovers of fairy tales.
The Swedish Royal Palace gift shop was barely maneuverable due to tourists snapping up the merchandise related to this event. I noticed my complete lack of interest in this recent royal wedding - a reversal from my twenties.
Princess Diana and Prince Charles
When I was twenty-two years old, I fell head over heels for the fairy tale of my time: Prince Charles and Lady Diana. I delighted in every minute detail of the wedding planning. I could not consume enough pictures of every fabulous thing Lady Diana said, wore, or did. I got up at 3 a.m. to watch the entire ceremony. When I was married the following year, I asked my florist to reproduce EXACTLY the bouquet Diana had carried down the aisle.
Prince Charles and Lady Diana’s relationship all turned out to BE a fairy tale. In other words, a fictional story designed for public consumption that wasn’t true. It was merely good for business and marketing a nation. I feel naive and silly, in retrospect, for having expected that it should be otherwise. Royal marriages don’t even have a tradition of being about love.
This female fantasy women have of being a princess doesn’t even need to be projected onto a specific woman. There's a famous business legend about a guy hired to help the Walt Disney Company grow their business.
As the new consumer products division chief, Andrew Mooney attended his first "Disney on Ice" show. While waiting in line, he found himself surrounded by young girls dressed as princesses. “They weren’t even Disney products. They were generic princess products,” he mused. Soon after realizing the demand for all things princess-related, the Disney Princess line was formed. In 2009, that "Princess" division grossed an estimated $4 billion.
As a pure business proposition, the Swedes chip in under $2 a piece to support the royal family. For their $16 million, they get a photograph-able family that can generate publicity and interest in Sweden more than any prime minister could.
What I DO find myself attracted to in Swedish culture, is this group of people who have banded together to proclaim the idea of kings and queens a ridiculously outdated notion. You can read about their ideas here.
Think about it, if we as human beings have gotten rid of stupid ideas like serfs and slaves, why haven’t we yet rid ourselves of the obsolete notion (on the other end of the spectrum) that chosen human beings should serve as "Truman Show" figureheads above the rest of us?
Maybe women have a deep-seated need for princesses.
What is a princess? I would define her as a pampered girl, indulged in consumption unavailable to others due to her birth rather than her innovative ideas or labor. Her power isn’t exercised directly because she doesn’t, after all, have the responsibility to produce anything. Her job is merely to “be,” not to “do.” Why? Because by being fashionable, beautiful, and of high birth she's...worthy. Ick.
That's why we women fall for it...being deemed worthy. But why do we need hereditary monarchy to be any of those things. Why do we need to be a princess to be fashionable, beautiful, of acclaimed parentage, or worthy?
Can't get enough pictures
of Michelle Obama's dresses!
I'm not saying I don't turn into a girly-girl the minute Michelle Obama's State Dinner Dress photos come out. Hey, I am woman. I love pretty dresses. What got Michelle Obama there? The power and audacity of the ideas represented, not dated institutions that have outlived their Medieval existence.
I was bemused at yet another way I find Scandinavians to be global thought leaders. This group of Swedish people (called the Swedish Republican Association) made me think and I'd like you to think with me. If princesses didn't exist, what would young women dream of being? Could it likely be a healthier idea for humanity and relationships? A more realistic idea? Can you imagine people of the future laughing at us for even allowing the idea of undemocratic monarchies to exist? For needing the “idea” of princesses?
What would you dream of being if princesses didn't exist?
Monday, January 31, 2011
Visiting the Nobel Museum
Freezing yet Cheerful
I'm in Stockholm!
A scientist friend told me once that a Nobel Prize in Sciences was a dated concept. He said most breakthroughs require an ensemble, a team, and the idea of one guy toiling passionately for years in his lab until one day he says, "Eureka!" is overly dramatic. He felt it was not the likely way big discoveries will happen in the 21st century.
That may be, but I found, like most tourists, that visiting the Nobel Museum was #1 on my list of things to do in Stockholm. To me, the Nobel Prize represents goodness over evil, enlightenment over superstition, knowledge over anti-intellectualism, and excellence over mediocrity.
I respond to the innovation and thought leadership I see from the Scandinavian countries. Having figured out what works for their countries and developed themselves to the highest degree, as societies they seem free to operate as aristocrats who no longer have to worry about earning a living and can move on to higher, more noble concerns such as how to advance the human race. The Nobel Prize is just the most prominent example.
A beautiful reclining Buddha
displayed as part of an art exhibit
at the Nobel Museum
celebrating the philosophy
of the Dalia Lama
Beautiful and inspiring sentiments
on a garden bench
also part of the art exhibit
Sculpture formed out of
discarded Manhattan phone books
I loved not only seeing the art exhibit but the short movies about each Nobel Prize winner and the other movie about creative environments that breed innovation and excellence without apology. There wasn't an exhibit on how to raise a Nobel Prize winner. I suppose by the time people win, their parents aren't alive to celebrate with them and to be asked how they did it. That's probably not so important. I don't know about you, but I've always observed there is no shortage of worthy scientists, instead there's a shortage of funding for all their great work.
The Nobel Museum is in a stately old building set amidst Old Town Stockholm. I had to tease the front desk clerk that the big clock in the middle of the exhibit space was dead and not working in a building devoted to celebrating excellence. "I know, she grinned, we've tried for three years to get it to run properly. No luck." The irony made me smile. Maybe they should offer a prize.
Labels:
art,
Nobel prize,
Norway,
Sweden
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Daydreaming at Stockholm City Hall
Stockholm City Hall
photo by Yanlin Li
I can't think of anything in the world more prestigious than a Nobel Prize, can you? One of the great pleasures of being in Stockholm was to see the sites associated with the yearly Nobel Prize event. One of the places used to celebrate humanity's most illustrious achievements is Stockholm's City Hall.The Blue Hall
at Stockholm City Hall
Photo by Yanlin Li
I don't know why I find everything associated with the Nobel Prize deeply romantic, but I do. Probably because while the Prize goes to one person, you know that someone doesn't achieve something like that without incredible help and support. I found myself reacting to all of Stockholm's Nobel glory with schoolgirl wonder.
One night in Stockholm, I watched new members who were going to be inducted into the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences arrive at City Hall in their white tie and evening gowns. It was such a beautiful moment to see, knowing that this had to be one of the happiest moments of their lives. Bravo! Brava!
Now that I think about it, it wasn't just seeing Swedish scientists arrive for dinner and dancing that made it all seem so fanciful. I do know why I find it all so dreamily romantic.
I've always had a serious crush on CalTech scientist Richard Feynman who won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1965. Feynman would now be over 90 but he died in 1988. I think back to his wonderful essay "The Value of Science" which is so breathtakingly beautiful, it has the ability to make every humanities major question their choices.
I went through a period where I read every single book Richard Feynman wrote for a general audience. While I had never taken physics in school, his enthusiasm for the subject always made me realize "I am missing out somehow!" He had such a flair for showmanship when explaining physics. Most people remember him not for his Nobel Prize, but for explaining very simply, using only a glass of water on the table, how the Space Shuttle Challenger blew up.
One night in Stockholm, I watched new members who were going to be inducted into the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences arrive at City Hall in their white tie and evening gowns. It was such a beautiful moment to see, knowing that this had to be one of the happiest moments of their lives. Bravo! Brava!
Now that I think about it, it wasn't just seeing Swedish scientists arrive for dinner and dancing that made it all seem so fanciful. I do know why I find it all so dreamily romantic.
I've always had a serious crush on CalTech scientist Richard Feynman who won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1965. Feynman would now be over 90 but he died in 1988. I think back to his wonderful essay "The Value of Science" which is so breathtakingly beautiful, it has the ability to make every humanities major question their choices.
I went through a period where I read every single book Richard Feynman wrote for a general audience. While I had never taken physics in school, his enthusiasm for the subject always made me realize "I am missing out somehow!" He had such a flair for showmanship when explaining physics. Most people remember him not for his Nobel Prize, but for explaining very simply, using only a glass of water on the table, how the Space Shuttle Challenger blew up.
The Swedish Flag
Hanging in the Blue Hall
More Swedish Pride
The Blue Hall is the largest room in Stockholm City Hall and it is most famous for being used every year for the Nobel banquet every December 10th. Every year 1,300 people squeeze themselves into this beautiful space with just 40 inches of space between them. So what if you have to eat with your elbows close to your sides, this is one of the most exclusive invitations on Earth, no?
Table service for the Nobel Dinner
Two beautiful bas relief sculptures
in the Prince's Hall
within Stockholm City Hall
where receptions are held year round.
These window sculptures
overlook the harbor and a
terrace about as European and romantic
as terraces can get.
The Golden Hall
at Stockholm City Hall
where laureates go to dance.
Isn't it fabulous?
Photo by Yanlin Li
The Golden Hall at Stockholm City Hall is done with a beautiful golden mosaic that could best be described as Picasso's Byzantine Period. Picasso didn't have a Byzantine period, you say? I know. But if he did, this is what it would look like.
What? You say your City Hall
back home isn't quite this cool?
Yeah, same here.
The architect gave the artist a mere two years to finish the entire job, something the mosaic master felt would take at least 6 or 7 to do properly. One of the very fun stories the tour guide relates is pointing out a headless Swedish patriot at the top of one mosaic, surrounded by equally headless friends.
"Why Mr. Artist, did your patriot get put up there on the wall minus his head?"
The artist said, "well, that's due to him having lost his head to the enemy in battle. I didn't portray him with his entire body and head, but left the head off as he lost it in service to his country."
"Yes, but Mr. Artist, why then are there a couple other characters without their heads at exactly the point where the wall meets the ceiling? Could it be you forgot that there would be 4 to 5 feet of benches at the base of the wall and the entire mosaic was raised 5 feet?" Ouch.
One would never pick these mistakes out on one's own - or even want to, actually. It's the Swedish strength and ability to laugh at themselves, that makes these very human tours possible.
Oh, and look what I found. Richard Feynman dancing in white tie during his Nobel weekend. That is one lucky girl.
Richard Feynman and his wife Gweneth Howarth
1965
Photo from the CalTech Archives
Labels:
American people,
architecture,
art,
Nobel prize,
Sweden
Saturday, January 15, 2011
There is No Need to Save Face in Sweden
Can you see the people near the bottom
of the magnificent Vasa Warship?
There were so many things that impressed me about Sweden but one of the most fun to experience was that a couple of the top tourist attractions in Stockholm all involve human mistakes. And the Swedes are OK with that! They not only don't hide them, they tell you the fun stories behind each one.
The most prominent human mistake on display in Sweden is the Vasa Warship Museum. A couple of hundred years ago, King Gustavas of Sweden wanted to go raise hell in Poland and had one fine warship built for himself to use invading Polish harbors. When he had it built, he spared no expense in putting all kinds of colorful, scary carvings on it intending, of course, to have Polish sailors peeing in their boots when they saw it coming. The Swedish king wanted to use it to sink every Polish ship in their harbor and block all activity.
Restored carvings
showing how the ship was painted in
full color that
conveyed the King's might
When a strong wind hit it shortly after launch, the ship leaned enough to one side that water starting pouring into the open windows used for the cannons. It sailed all of 20 minutes before sinking, blocking the Swedish harbor, not the Polish one.
Three hundred years later, a Swedish archeologist decided that Sweden needed to bring the ship up from the depths of the mud and now the whole thing is on display. I'm not a guy, but when I entered the museum and saw this giant, gorgeous instrument of war, even I got a testosterone rush. It was 17th century shock and awe.
Scary and beautiful carvings
on the back of the ship
sans their color
Hearing about how bad math doomed the ship reminded me of Henri Petroski's wonderfully readable book about the role of failure in design called "To Engineer is Human." Doctors bury their mistakes, but poor shipbuilders, builders and engineers have to experience all of their failures publicly. VASA museum tour guides are very used to the giggles that come out of tourist mouths like mine as we contemplated how embarrassing it all must have been.
I ask you though, hasn't the Swedish bravery in showcasing their mistake given that warship a higher purpose? Kids, look what happens when you don't do your math homework!
You might also enjoy these other posts on Sweden:
A Week In Sweden
Daydreaming at Stockholm City Hall
Visiting the Nobel Museum
Visiting Sweden: If This is Socialism, Sign Me Up!
What Idea(s) Captured Your Imagination in 2010?
The Swedish Tourist Attraction that Didn't Attract Me
If It Were My Home: Comparing Sweden to the United States
Labels:
Sweden,
travel history,
Vasa Warship
Friday, January 7, 2011
A Week in Sweden
Starting a fun day of sightseeing
at a cold beautiful overlook of Stockholm
I recently had the opportunity to visit Sweden. I went in November, an unusual time to go close to the Artic Circle but it was when I had time available.
A beautiful woman who helped with
directions in the central city.
Can you tell she's Swedish?
She is.
This young woman was
on my tram in Stockholm.
Can you tell she's Swedish?
She is.
Astrid and Ingrid and Märta and Linnea
Einer and Anders and Liam and Mattias and Nils
and these last names:
Eriksson and Olsson and Gustafsson and Lindberg and Eklund and Lindgren and Lundin and Nordstrom
A Swedish Royal Palace Guard
Can you tell he's Swedish? He is.
Contemporary Swedes have an open heart. It's not always easy to do so, but they do. They have opened their country to immigrants from other countries and are now learning terrific food from them like I learned about Swedish tea rings and lefsa back home in Iowa.
This polite young man came to Sweden
from Somalia when he was six.
Can you tell he's Swedish? He is.
Can you tell this man is Swedish?
OK, he's half Swedish.
The other half is Zambian.
I admired the Swede's open hearts because when everyone is sooooo ethnically similar, it has to be disconcerting to have people with different religions and traditions and values and ideas integrate into your society and start to change things by just being their normal selves going about their normal daily lives.
In one grocery store, I asked an immigrant helping me find cranberries where he was from. "Kurdistan!" he said, with all of the fierceness he could muster. I had to think about it for a moment and then realized the reason I didn't know where it was is because it is an area within Iraq.
Knowing that there are all kinds of people like him scattered across the globe in an ethnic diaspora, is a reminder to give all of these people a break. I was glad when he dissolved into a surprised fit of giggles hearing me give him an Turkish "tessekur ederim" (thank you).
Complimenting a Swedish lady about her country's openness to immigrants, she said, "but who can say who is Swedish? My grandparents are from Poland!".
We Americans should be especially grateful for the Swedish open hearts because they are the world's people most gracious enough to take in Iraqis fleeing strife cause by the war and occupation the Bush Administration started in Iraq. In 2006, Swedes took in more Iraqis than any other country in the European Union. Christian Iraqis, fearing persecution in their homeland, make up a large part of that influx after Iraq occupation in 2003.
Sweden, this little tiny nation of 9 million, has taken in 100,000 Iraqis. America, with a population of 310,000,000 has only taken in 350,000-400,000 Iraqis from a war we started. If you meet a Swede, America, you might want to say "thanks."
Or, we could do even better, we could crack open our hearts a little.
Labels:
American culture,
beauty,
European Union,
Iraq,
Kurdish culture,
Sweden
Friday, December 31, 2010
Top Five Posts for 2010
I was recently enjoying my friend Sher's blog where she chronicled her top five posts of the year. It made me wonder what my top five posts for the year have been. They aren't what I expected. I thought my most visited post would be this one:
I Saw A Suicide Bombing in Istanbul Yesterday
but here they are in descending order of visits:
How the Czech Government Delighted Me as a Consumer
(about the Czech Republic's fabulous train service)
Futurista Builds Upon the Past
(about beautiful Czech design - the shop has since moved )
Starting My Third Year Without a Car
(this post is just a month old but wow, did it get traffic!)
The Legend of Starved Rock
(a last bit of Illinois tourism before I moved overseas)
Who Will be the Czech Jamie Oliver?
(my thoughts on Czech cuisine)
I have no idea why these posts resonated so if you have feedback for me on what were your favorite posts I would love to hear it! May you have a wonderful and prosperous 2011!
I Saw A Suicide Bombing in Istanbul Yesterday
but here they are in descending order of visits:
How the Czech Government Delighted Me as a Consumer
(about the Czech Republic's fabulous train service)
Futurista Builds Upon the Past
(about beautiful Czech design - the shop has since moved )
Starting My Third Year Without a Car
(this post is just a month old but wow, did it get traffic!)
The Legend of Starved Rock
(a last bit of Illinois tourism before I moved overseas)
Who Will be the Czech Jamie Oliver?
(my thoughts on Czech cuisine)
I have no idea why these posts resonated so if you have feedback for me on what were your favorite posts I would love to hear it! May you have a wonderful and prosperous 2011!
Labels:
blogging
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Does the World Need the Opposite of a Nobel Peace Prize?
Do you remember when Ronald Reagan first declared the totalitarian Soviet Union an "evil empire?" Many citizens in the Soviet Union cite that moment as the one that caused them to really think about and question their own system.
"How could that be?" I wondered, "Everyone could see it was evil, why couldn't the people who actually live there? Why would it take an American President to make them stop and question something that was so obviously not working for participants and outsiders alike?"
Reagan said:
If people get delusional, it makes sense that countries and societies can get delusional too. They are just a giant collection of individual people. Indeed, there are delightful books written about economic self-delusion such as Tulipmania: The Story of the World's Most Coveted Flower & the Extraordinary Passions It Aroused. Another well-known form of personal delusion is addiction as described in the fiction bestseller A Million Little Pieces.
What could some national delusions be? How about:
Colonization?
Debt loads?
Empire?
Ethnic cleansing (World War II Germany and the Balkans and Rwanda more recently)?
Environmental degradation?
Hatred? (Middle Eastern attitudes toward Jewish People and European attitudes toward Roma)?
Extreme Paranoia and Societal Militarization (North Korea)?
Extreme Paranoia and Thugocracy? (Iran)
Nationalization of Property? (Soviet Union)
Non-Acceptance of Election Results? (Ivory Coast)
Extraordinary Corruption? (Afghanistan)
Extraordinary Use of Resources (United Arab Emirates and the United States)
Censorship and Lack of Free Expression (China)
What if someone with more credibility and less baggage than President Bush, a disinterested organization with a track record of caring, credibility, and leadership toward uplifting humanity gave the national equivalent of a 12-step intervention to a nation? A diplomatic call to "snap out of it!"
I propose that such a yearly intervention exist. Coming from the Nobel Committee, this yearly-awarded challenge could go to the country most needing a loving intervention and reminder that your fellow humans wish the best for you and think you can and should do better.
In order to let a nation know it needs to change, this intervention could be labeled not the Nobel Prize, but the Nobel Challenge. The Nobel Challenge would be the very classy national equivalent of friends and family sending an addict to rehab. Detox, please!
Even if countries go behind "an iron curtain," if the citizens have known about the prize beforehand and find out that their country has won the award, it becomes a kind of shorthand meaning "look long and hard at the direction your nation is headed. We, orignators of the award, "challenge" you because we think your nation is the one potentially endangering the peace of the world. It forces debate among citizens that can't be so easily dismissed and ignored.
The Nobel Challenge could be the sort of thing that seeps change into a country at the grassroots level. How can any one story in the media reach the North Korean people and give them the message "the entire world thinks you need a change." For all I know, the North Korean people know that better than we do. But do all the people of Iran? What seeps into the minds of the oppressed at the grass roots level? One big call to action might not only bring people to discuss change, but be empowered to create change.
Here's another example from my own culture where a society fails to recognize its own delusion. There were recently stories in the news that America and the United Arab Emirates consume electricity and water in huge quantities. The United Arab Emirates used four times as much water as Europe and four times as much electricity as the United States. These stories may have been noted for about 24 hours when they came out but most citizens of those countries would just yawn in indifference.What if the world, in the form of the Nobel Committee, said through the Nobel Challenge, "your use of resources is unsustainable, please change, your behaviour could create potential conflicts." First, my country would have a hissy fit, then we would get down to business and exceed whatever benchmark was given for change.
So how can humanity create change rather than yawning indifference to a long-term story? Think instead how the announcement of a Nobel Prize is treated. The tradition is institutionalized so journalists are prepared for the announcement and make sure to cover it in a significant way. It's a tradition that is highly anticipated around the world. It has a track record that people can discuss and debate. It has a meaning deeper than one particular year or person or organization. Instantly, when a Nobel Prize is announced, book clubs around the world read the works written by the author cited in the literature prize, for example, and think about the author's ideas and discuss what has been held up to the light by the prize.
Why even a totalitarian nation might have a hard time keeping that news from it's people no matter how hard it tried. It would be the equivalent of when an addict is confronted by all their family and all of their coworkers and the ability to "excuse" is stripped away. I recognize that defiance (one of the central hallmarks of an addict), may be the outcome of a dictator being challenged in this way, but the world has to shut him down sometime.
In George Orwell's "Animal Farm," it's when the pigs take the milk and apples from the other animals and the other animals notice and don't say anything that the abuse of power continues and increases. Orwell calls it the turning point of the story. When Chamberlain appeased Hitler with Czechoslovakia, same thing. Indeed, an ignored Nobel Challenge to someone like Saddam for the way he treated his citizens might have given George Bush some legitimacy for later intervention (I can't believe I just said that, I didn't believe in that military intervention one whit).
As the history of the Nobel Challenge built up, it might begin to have a preemptive performance effect before it is even given. Jack Welch, the CEO of GE chosen by Fortune Magazine as the "Manager of the Century", was famous for the performance he got out of his company (when he took over as CEO, revenues were $26.8 billion - when he left they were $130 billion). He had a rule that he would eliminate the bottom 10% of nonperforming staff every year. Can you imagine how extremely motivating it must have been to people to not be in that bottom 10%? Can you imagine how motivating it would be to not have your country ever receive a Nobel Challenge? It sounds cruel, but actual conflicts are crueler. Just read my previous blog post for a reminder.
All managers of any sort of human enterprise know that there is an entire emotional cycle to implementing change with all kinds of foot-dragging and noise by those who hate changing. The Nobel Challenge could be helpful in prodding those who love the status quo because it's the "devil they know." The world may have to absorb change at an even faster pace in the future.
If our species doesn't find a way to challenge the ever-expanding global abuses of power in a cost-effective, non-military way, could it be the turning point in our story?
"How could that be?" I wondered, "Everyone could see it was evil, why couldn't the people who actually live there? Why would it take an American President to make them stop and question something that was so obviously not working for participants and outsiders alike?"
Reagan said:
...I urge you to beware the temptation of pride, the temptation of blithely declaring yourselves above it all and label both sides equally at fault, to ignore the facts of history and the aggressive impulses of an evil empire, to simply call the arms race a giant misunderstanding and thereby remove yourself from the struggle between right and wrong and good and evil.President Bush tried to create the same effect of waking foreign citizens out of their denial by demanding Iran, Iraq, and North Korea end their "axis of evil." Unfortunately, President Bush seemed to be in his own self-delusion regarding weapons of mass destruction in Iraq at the time so it didn't quite have the intended effect. And it also didn't accurately reflect those three nations diplomatic actions. They weren't in a tri-part pact.
If people get delusional, it makes sense that countries and societies can get delusional too. They are just a giant collection of individual people. Indeed, there are delightful books written about economic self-delusion such as Tulipmania: The Story of the World's Most Coveted Flower & the Extraordinary Passions It Aroused. Another well-known form of personal delusion is addiction as described in the fiction bestseller A Million Little Pieces.
What could some national delusions be? How about:
Colonization?
Debt loads?
Empire?
Ethnic cleansing (World War II Germany and the Balkans and Rwanda more recently)?
Environmental degradation?
Hatred? (Middle Eastern attitudes toward Jewish People and European attitudes toward Roma)?
Extreme Paranoia and Societal Militarization (North Korea)?
Extreme Paranoia and Thugocracy? (Iran)
Nationalization of Property? (Soviet Union)
Non-Acceptance of Election Results? (Ivory Coast)
Extraordinary Corruption? (Afghanistan)
Extraordinary Use of Resources (United Arab Emirates and the United States)
Censorship and Lack of Free Expression (China)
What if someone with more credibility and less baggage than President Bush, a disinterested organization with a track record of caring, credibility, and leadership toward uplifting humanity gave the national equivalent of a 12-step intervention to a nation? A diplomatic call to "snap out of it!"
I propose that such a yearly intervention exist. Coming from the Nobel Committee, this yearly-awarded challenge could go to the country most needing a loving intervention and reminder that your fellow humans wish the best for you and think you can and should do better.
In order to let a nation know it needs to change, this intervention could be labeled not the Nobel Prize, but the Nobel Challenge. The Nobel Challenge would be the very classy national equivalent of friends and family sending an addict to rehab. Detox, please!
Even if countries go behind "an iron curtain," if the citizens have known about the prize beforehand and find out that their country has won the award, it becomes a kind of shorthand meaning "look long and hard at the direction your nation is headed. We, orignators of the award, "challenge" you because we think your nation is the one potentially endangering the peace of the world. It forces debate among citizens that can't be so easily dismissed and ignored.
The Nobel Challenge could be the sort of thing that seeps change into a country at the grassroots level. How can any one story in the media reach the North Korean people and give them the message "the entire world thinks you need a change." For all I know, the North Korean people know that better than we do. But do all the people of Iran? What seeps into the minds of the oppressed at the grass roots level? One big call to action might not only bring people to discuss change, but be empowered to create change.
Here's another example from my own culture where a society fails to recognize its own delusion. There were recently stories in the news that America and the United Arab Emirates consume electricity and water in huge quantities. The United Arab Emirates used four times as much water as Europe and four times as much electricity as the United States. These stories may have been noted for about 24 hours when they came out but most citizens of those countries would just yawn in indifference.What if the world, in the form of the Nobel Committee, said through the Nobel Challenge, "your use of resources is unsustainable, please change, your behaviour could create potential conflicts." First, my country would have a hissy fit, then we would get down to business and exceed whatever benchmark was given for change.
So how can humanity create change rather than yawning indifference to a long-term story? Think instead how the announcement of a Nobel Prize is treated. The tradition is institutionalized so journalists are prepared for the announcement and make sure to cover it in a significant way. It's a tradition that is highly anticipated around the world. It has a track record that people can discuss and debate. It has a meaning deeper than one particular year or person or organization. Instantly, when a Nobel Prize is announced, book clubs around the world read the works written by the author cited in the literature prize, for example, and think about the author's ideas and discuss what has been held up to the light by the prize.
Why even a totalitarian nation might have a hard time keeping that news from it's people no matter how hard it tried. It would be the equivalent of when an addict is confronted by all their family and all of their coworkers and the ability to "excuse" is stripped away. I recognize that defiance (one of the central hallmarks of an addict), may be the outcome of a dictator being challenged in this way, but the world has to shut him down sometime.
In George Orwell's "Animal Farm," it's when the pigs take the milk and apples from the other animals and the other animals notice and don't say anything that the abuse of power continues and increases. Orwell calls it the turning point of the story. When Chamberlain appeased Hitler with Czechoslovakia, same thing. Indeed, an ignored Nobel Challenge to someone like Saddam for the way he treated his citizens might have given George Bush some legitimacy for later intervention (I can't believe I just said that, I didn't believe in that military intervention one whit).
As the history of the Nobel Challenge built up, it might begin to have a preemptive performance effect before it is even given. Jack Welch, the CEO of GE chosen by Fortune Magazine as the "Manager of the Century", was famous for the performance he got out of his company (when he took over as CEO, revenues were $26.8 billion - when he left they were $130 billion). He had a rule that he would eliminate the bottom 10% of nonperforming staff every year. Can you imagine how extremely motivating it must have been to people to not be in that bottom 10%? Can you imagine how motivating it would be to not have your country ever receive a Nobel Challenge? It sounds cruel, but actual conflicts are crueler. Just read my previous blog post for a reminder.
All managers of any sort of human enterprise know that there is an entire emotional cycle to implementing change with all kinds of foot-dragging and noise by those who hate changing. The Nobel Challenge could be helpful in prodding those who love the status quo because it's the "devil they know." The world may have to absorb change at an even faster pace in the future.
If our species doesn't find a way to challenge the ever-expanding global abuses of power in a cost-effective, non-military way, could it be the turning point in our story?
Wednesday, December 29, 2010
WWII was worse for Central Europe than even our histories and memories tell us
Sometimes reading about the evil of the Holocaust it seems so over-the-top that it's all one can do to take in the enormity of all of the killing and dehumanizing that went on in the concentration camps. Try to imagine this though, it's even worse than everyone thought.
Anne Applebaum, writing in the New York Review of Books, in an essay called "The Worst of the Madness" says that the camps may be the predominant preserved historical artifact of carnage. but much worse carnage occurred elsewhere, for example, in the killing fields of Central Europe. Those killings are less likely to be officially commemorated, remembered, or written about [probably because there is nothing to look at like photos or an actual camp].
Ms. Applebaum also argues that with two dictators, Hitler and Stalin, operating ruthlessly in the Central European theater, it accelerated and exacerbated the carnage of the other. The author argues that each side should expand their notion of guilt of what deaths they may have caused.
She says even the United States can't walk away from revising our notion of participation. That we weren't involved in just a "Good War" as Americans like to think of it. She suggests it was more morally ambiguous because Central Europe and the East were left to experience 45 years of totalitarianism.
I found that hard to take because I think Americans would have loved to liberate to the east of Pilsen, but deferred to the Soviets in thanks for their help. It's true that we Americans would probably never imagine an entire region of the world getting walled off and it's inhabitants being treated like prisoners. As an American of the next generation, reading about it all just increases my respect for all of those in Central Europe that coped, and perished, due to "The Worst of the Madness."
Thanks to David Brooks, opinion writer for the New York Times, for alerting me to this magazine essay. He chose it as one of the best of 2010.
Anne Applebaum, writing in the New York Review of Books, in an essay called "The Worst of the Madness" says that the camps may be the predominant preserved historical artifact of carnage. but much worse carnage occurred elsewhere, for example, in the killing fields of Central Europe. Those killings are less likely to be officially commemorated, remembered, or written about [probably because there is nothing to look at like photos or an actual camp].
Ms. Applebaum also argues that with two dictators, Hitler and Stalin, operating ruthlessly in the Central European theater, it accelerated and exacerbated the carnage of the other. The author argues that each side should expand their notion of guilt of what deaths they may have caused.
She says even the United States can't walk away from revising our notion of participation. That we weren't involved in just a "Good War" as Americans like to think of it. She suggests it was more morally ambiguous because Central Europe and the East were left to experience 45 years of totalitarianism.
I found that hard to take because I think Americans would have loved to liberate to the east of Pilsen, but deferred to the Soviets in thanks for their help. It's true that we Americans would probably never imagine an entire region of the world getting walled off and it's inhabitants being treated like prisoners. As an American of the next generation, reading about it all just increases my respect for all of those in Central Europe that coped, and perished, due to "The Worst of the Madness."
Thanks to David Brooks, opinion writer for the New York Times, for alerting me to this magazine essay. He chose it as one of the best of 2010.
Thursday, December 23, 2010
St. Clement's Anglican English-Speaking Church Services will be broadcast globally this Christmas on BBC Radio 4
You've heard that Christmas carol about ''Good King Wenceslas,'' right? Well who was he? The Czechs know but everyone else could probably use a little background. My beloved church community in old town Prague has had the great honor to be selected by BBC Radio 4 to broadcast a program about the life and death of St Stephen and also of Wenceslas, tenth century Duke of Bohemia, who became known as St Vaclav, patron saint of the Czech Republic.
Would you like to hear it yourself on Sunday, December 26th? It will be available online at 08.10 GMT (9.10 CET in the Czech Republic) and you can also listen to it anytime in the next seven days after that.
I'm so proud to see my friend and pastor Ricky Yates be honored this way and so happy more people will discover this wonderful community of people who gather weekly from all over the world to worship in Prague.
Merry Christmas!
Would you like to hear it yourself on Sunday, December 26th? It will be available online at 08.10 GMT (9.10 CET in the Czech Republic) and you can also listen to it anytime in the next seven days after that.
I'm so proud to see my friend and pastor Ricky Yates be honored this way and so happy more people will discover this wonderful community of people who gather weekly from all over the world to worship in Prague.
Merry Christmas!
Friday, December 17, 2010
Celebrating Those Who Celebrate the Best In Humanity
2010 Nobel Peace Prize Winner Liu Xiaobo (right)
and his wife Liu Xia (left)
Last week about this time I was watching the live coverage of the Nobel Peace Prize ceremony. Did you happen to catch it? It was moving. Apparently CNN International does a live interview with the recipient immediately after they receive their prize. China did not allow this year's recipient, a Chinese citizen, to travel to Oslo to receive his prize (note to Communist Central Committees - anytime your decision puts you and Adolf Hitler in the same historical footnote, you might want to consider alternative viewpoints before making the final call).
CNN International was left to use their entire Nobel Peace Prize interview hour to discuss with various people what human rights are like in China. If you were watching, like me, did you come to the same conclusion that all of us really know nothing of what is going on in China?
CNN International mentioned that the People's Republic employs 50,000 people just to keep the Internet censored at all times. It made me think about how many goods I purchase from China (especially since every country's manufacturing seems to have been farmed out there) and how little these purchases reflect my values if they are being manufactured in a tolitarian state. The first step in addressing a problem is awareness.
It impressed me that despite all of its economic power, the majority of the world would not be bullied into ignoring the ceremony based on China's demands. It impressed me that Norway is charged with administering the Nobel Peace Prize because Alfred Nobel admired that Norway had never declared war on another country (check out their wealth indicators - peace pays). It impressed me that such a tiny, little country has found a way to capture the world's imagination, to get people like me to slow down for an afternoon, and to consider where we as a species are going. Norway, there is nothing small about your ideas.
To honor the Norweigan people for their ability to be the thought leaders of the world on the subject of peace, I want to do my small part today and share something I never heard of or read until I moved to Europe. It is the Universal Declaration of Human Rights created by the United Nations 61 years ago.
Get a cup of coffee, take a few moments, and ask yourself if your country measures up on every article. Did you even know this Declaration existed? Did you even know that some of these items were your rights as a human being as decided by the peoples of the Earth? Were you surprised by any of the human rights declared? I was surprised by Article 16, the whole section on marriage and family.
How can we as individuals move our global leaders closer to honoring these rights rather than ignoring them? Do you feel your own country is delivering on these globally universal human rights?
Labels:
China,
globalism,
Nobel prize,
Norway,
politics
Friday, December 10, 2010
Heda Kovaly, Czech Who Wrote of Totalitarianism, Is Dead at 91
People of a certain age in the Czech Republic have had the misfortune of experiencing the full blast of the worst of the 20th century. The Czech Republic was occupied by the Nazis longer than any other country. Quickly after the nightmare ended, years and years of gray totalitarianism started.
While I have not read this author, I can't help but read her obituary and be impressed by her dignity, her humanity, and her sheer ability to survive. Here's what the New York Times reviewer had to say about her book looking back on the worst of totalitarianism in Central Europe:
“This is an extraordinary memoir, so heartbreaking that I have reread it for months, unable to rise to the business of ‘reviewing’ less a book than a life repeatedly outraged by the worst totalitarians in Europe. Yet it is written with so much quiet respect for the minutiae of justice and truth that one does not know where and how to specify Heda Kovaly’s splendidness as a human being.”
Take a moment to click on my title and read about the life of Heda Kovaly, author of ''Under a Cruel Star.''
While I have not read this author, I can't help but read her obituary and be impressed by her dignity, her humanity, and her sheer ability to survive. Here's what the New York Times reviewer had to say about her book looking back on the worst of totalitarianism in Central Europe:
“This is an extraordinary memoir, so heartbreaking that I have reread it for months, unable to rise to the business of ‘reviewing’ less a book than a life repeatedly outraged by the worst totalitarians in Europe. Yet it is written with so much quiet respect for the minutiae of justice and truth that one does not know where and how to specify Heda Kovaly’s splendidness as a human being.”
Take a moment to click on my title and read about the life of Heda Kovaly, author of ''Under a Cruel Star.''
Labels:
#WITMonth,
books,
communism,
Czech culture,
Czech people,
Czechoslovakia,
Jewish culture
Monday, December 6, 2010
Starting My Third Year Without a Car
It never occurred to me that I could live without a car until I decided to become an ''Empty Nest Expat.'' Such is the constant brainwashing of Americans that the American dream must include a car. Had I known how fantastic it is to not own a vehicle, I wish I could have given it up much sooner.
I sold my beloved Saturn red coupe the month before I left to go overseas. A Saturn was the perfect car for a woman to own because it was possible to buy the car without negotiation and to pay for three years of maintenance up front. Saturn's innovation was pricing the product visiably so buyers didn't feel that it was a contest with the car salesman to see who could 'best' the other in deciding on a price.
As a Saturn car owner, all I had to do was drive the car into the dealership every 3,000 miles to get the oil changed. My favorable opinion must not have been universally held because the Saturn brand went bankrupt a year after I sold my car. Even loving the car as I had, I didn't appreciate how much nicer life is without one.
Moving to Prague, I was able to enjoy a very simple, cost-effective transportation system at the low cost price of $22 a month. This enabled me to have a wonderful quality of life because I could easily go home for lunch from most places in the city and I didn't have to devote any of my time to gassing up, car washes, or getting my vehicle maintained. I also didn't have to devote my time to being stuck in traffic because public transportation always had a dedicated lane, metro tube, or tram track. Better yet, I no longer needed to earn the money necessary to own a car. This opened up more free time.
I have lived in two subsequent cities since then: Madison, Wisconsin in the United States and Istanbul, Turkey. In both places, public transportation works just fine and a car is superfluous. I never want to go back to spending money on something I don't actually value!
When I get in a car now as a passenger (a very rare occurrence) I'm always struck by the stress that the driver is experiencing. I am thrilled to give up that need for control and have the freedom and lack of stress created by leaving the driving to others.
I would never have learned this without moving to another culture because my own consumer culture constantly reinforces that I should own a car.
I sold my beloved Saturn red coupe the month before I left to go overseas. A Saturn was the perfect car for a woman to own because it was possible to buy the car without negotiation and to pay for three years of maintenance up front. Saturn's innovation was pricing the product visiably so buyers didn't feel that it was a contest with the car salesman to see who could 'best' the other in deciding on a price.
As a Saturn car owner, all I had to do was drive the car into the dealership every 3,000 miles to get the oil changed. My favorable opinion must not have been universally held because the Saturn brand went bankrupt a year after I sold my car. Even loving the car as I had, I didn't appreciate how much nicer life is without one.
Moving to Prague, I was able to enjoy a very simple, cost-effective transportation system at the low cost price of $22 a month. This enabled me to have a wonderful quality of life because I could easily go home for lunch from most places in the city and I didn't have to devote any of my time to gassing up, car washes, or getting my vehicle maintained. I also didn't have to devote my time to being stuck in traffic because public transportation always had a dedicated lane, metro tube, or tram track. Better yet, I no longer needed to earn the money necessary to own a car. This opened up more free time.
I have lived in two subsequent cities since then: Madison, Wisconsin in the United States and Istanbul, Turkey. In both places, public transportation works just fine and a car is superfluous. I never want to go back to spending money on something I don't actually value!
When I get in a car now as a passenger (a very rare occurrence) I'm always struck by the stress that the driver is experiencing. I am thrilled to give up that need for control and have the freedom and lack of stress created by leaving the driving to others.
I would never have learned this without moving to another culture because my own consumer culture constantly reinforces that I should own a car.
Labels:
American culture,
empty nest,
expat,
Prague,
Prague transport
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)