Tap, tap, tap. Is this thing on? I'm not sure. Because I can't physically see my blog. You'll have to tell me if you can. I'm physically prevented from seeing what I write here so I hope you can read it. I just now figured out how to get a post on my blog through a blogging "back door."
I haven't posted in over a month. That hasn't happened in the three years I've been writing this blog because there has been so much I've wanted to share in my traveling adventure.
As many of you know, I moved to Istanbul, Turkey last summer and have thoroughly enjoyed myself here. I'm a bit behind in blogging about my adventures because well, a move is disruptive, and time-consuming. Turkey itself is a fantastically-interesting country with incredible history and beauty. I can't wait to tell you about it!
Right now, however, my blog and any other bloggers using Google's Blogspot domain are being censored in Turkey. The story printed in the papers was that one person was illegally streaming football matches over his blog and a judge ordered not just his blog shut down, but the entire domain! Blogspot gets 18 million hits a month in this country alone. I sincerely hope you aren't a Turkish person trying to run a business on your blog cause you've been out of luck for over a month now. I can't even imagine how frustrating that would be!
Now I'm American so I don't know much about football. I've watched one game in my life, the final of the World Cup, and it was enough to convince me that I don't need to know too much more about football. Yawn! Geez, it's slow. But a game is over in one afternoon, right? I have no idea why this censorship continues. One of my American friends said, "well, maybe that guy wasn't streaming a football game, but a cricket match. Those go on for weeks, right?"
So here we bloggers sit. Still censored. Maybe it's because I'm a librarian and we librarians are constantly making sure the public has access to banned books. Maybe it's because I spent so much time in formerly-Communist Prague and I find the idea of repressed society unable to express their opinions so compelling and worthy of my advocacy.
The effect of this banning was annoying at first, but now it's starting to feed my ego. I never would have thought to put "being censored" on my bucket list, but hey, now I can cross it off the list as "done! Been there, done that, bought the T-shirt" What could we all have to say that merits this silence? Why, I do believe my blog is samizdat (the Russian name for literature that doesn't have the official seal of approval so it has to be self-published)! How wonderfully romantic. The librarian in my loves the idea of "Banned in the 'Bul!" Somebody ought to make T-shirts and sell them.
Another thing the librarian in me is giggling at: I'm not the one doing the shushing here!
Saturday, April 2, 2011
This Blog is Censored in Turkey
Labels:
blogging,
censorship,
communism,
expat,
samizdat,
transition,
Turkey
Monday, February 28, 2011
If It Were My Home: Comparing Sweden to the United States
In my final post about Sweden, I'd like to share a wonderful Internet site that appeals to the geeky librarian in me for its beautiful presentation of data and ease of understanding for the reader. This site is called ''If It Were My Home.'' It allows readers to compare two countries side-by-side. I'm glad to see the instincts telling me Sweden is outperforming the United States were correct. I wish I was wrong, alas, no.
The only category where we are outperforming Sweden is in income. Given that our wealth is at the top, and Sweden is 25% immigrants, it feels much wealthier than America when you're there.
Click on my title to go to the real site with extensive informatıon. Compare any two countries you want! Wouldn't it be cool if our countries felt competitive with each other about their statistical performance and started to compete on performance on our behalf?
Related posts:
There Is No Need to Save Face In Sweden
If This Is Socialism, Sign Me Up!
What Idea(s) Captured Your Imagination in 2010?
The Swedish Tourist Attraction That Didn't Attract Me
The only category where we are outperforming Sweden is in income. Given that our wealth is at the top, and Sweden is 25% immigrants, it feels much wealthier than America when you're there.
Click on my title to go to the real site with extensive informatıon. Compare any two countries you want! Wouldn't it be cool if our countries felt competitive with each other about their statistical performance and started to compete on performance on our behalf?
Related posts:
There Is No Need to Save Face In Sweden
If This Is Socialism, Sign Me Up!
What Idea(s) Captured Your Imagination in 2010?
The Swedish Tourist Attraction That Didn't Attract Me
Labels:
American culture,
politics,
Sweden
Monday, February 14, 2011
Visiting Sweden: If This is Socialism, Sign Me Up!
Sweden wowed me when I visited for one week last November. I was stunned by the general prosperıty of the population, and to be honest, I didn't quite understand it. For example, I spent time in Örebro, the 7th largest city in Sweden. It's the same size as a city I lived in America whose downtown had been hollowed out and decimated by the move of manufacturing from America to China. Why hasn't Sweden had the same trouble competing?
In Örebro, every downtown shop was rented and many were selling magnificent fashion. There was one fashion boutique after another. Imagine the best brands: Hugo Boss, Ralph Lauren, Burberry, etc. all being on offer in the downtown of an American manufacturing town. I can't. I could only assume the wealth hadn't 'trickled up' enough to move out-of-town.
I couldn't take my eyes off of Swedish old people over the age of 70. I wish I had thought to take pictures. Swedish old people are aging beautifully. I saw person after person looking 10 to 15 years younger than their actual age. The Swedish universal health care system meant that the entire population was better cared for their whole life and they must have had the faces and bodies and teeth and health they deserved. Not only did the old folks look great they were dressed fashionably in stylish clothes. As I was chatting up one older gentleman in Sweden who told me he was seventy, he said with a mischievous twinkle "yes, but if I start speaking French, I'm a mere 60!"
Human beings aren't the only part of Sweden that looks great. So does the land. In Turkey, every ounce of topsoil and all the trees are gone from my neck of the woods - quite understandable given 8,000 years of continuous civilization. In Sweden, the forests went on for miles and miles and the air and water were very clean. Swedes say they are very lucky because they didn't pay the price other European countries did during WWII, but they aren't giving themselves enough credit for being incredible stewards of the environment.
When I would compliment Swedes on their nation, I would hear "oh, but we have terrible problems with income inequality [the link shows they really don't, at least compared to everyone else, Swedes must be comparing internally]. Plus, it gets dark too early in the day and it is cold." Now would a statement like that about income inequality come out of an American's mouth? I don't think we would even think such a thought. Yet, our nation has more income equality than at any time since 1928.
I didn't actually get to see this but a friend in Stockholm told me there was an extensive series of tunnels underneath the City of Stockholm so that no neighborhood had to have a multi-lane highway going through it. Just the idea of being willing to spend tax money on underground highways so as to not impose that on anyone (in America, above-ground multi-lane highways would get imposed on poor neighborhoods) stunned me.
Visiting Sweden I couldn't help but think of American intellectual Cornell West. He has a phrase for our current American experience: "we have become well-adjusted to injustice." If Sweden represents the socialism that is so often derided back home in America, sign me up!
Related posts:
A Week in Sweden
There is No Need to Save Face in Sweden
Daydreaming at Stockholm City Hall
Visiting the Nobel Museum
The Swedish Tourist Attraction that Didn't Attract Me
In Örebro, every downtown shop was rented and many were selling magnificent fashion. There was one fashion boutique after another. Imagine the best brands: Hugo Boss, Ralph Lauren, Burberry, etc. all being on offer in the downtown of an American manufacturing town. I can't. I could only assume the wealth hadn't 'trickled up' enough to move out-of-town.
Surely I would find poverty in the public library.
Where are the homeless people
trying to stay warm?
They weren't sitting in the cafe
all day either
Wait...nope just a sculpture.
I went into the public library of Örebro to count how many homeless people I could see. If it matched a downtown library of an American manufacturing city on an equally frosty day, I would estimate in advance, that there would be about 20 homeless people. I couldn't find one. NOT ONE! I went through every nook and cranny of that library too from the top floor to the basement.I couldn't take my eyes off of Swedish old people over the age of 70. I wish I had thought to take pictures. Swedish old people are aging beautifully. I saw person after person looking 10 to 15 years younger than their actual age. The Swedish universal health care system meant that the entire population was better cared for their whole life and they must have had the faces and bodies and teeth and health they deserved. Not only did the old folks look great they were dressed fashionably in stylish clothes. As I was chatting up one older gentleman in Sweden who told me he was seventy, he said with a mischievous twinkle "yes, but if I start speaking French, I'm a mere 60!"
Human beings aren't the only part of Sweden that looks great. So does the land. In Turkey, every ounce of topsoil and all the trees are gone from my neck of the woods - quite understandable given 8,000 years of continuous civilization. In Sweden, the forests went on for miles and miles and the air and water were very clean. Swedes say they are very lucky because they didn't pay the price other European countries did during WWII, but they aren't giving themselves enough credit for being incredible stewards of the environment.
When I would compliment Swedes on their nation, I would hear "oh, but we have terrible problems with income inequality [the link shows they really don't, at least compared to everyone else, Swedes must be comparing internally]. Plus, it gets dark too early in the day and it is cold." Now would a statement like that about income inequality come out of an American's mouth? I don't think we would even think such a thought. Yet, our nation has more income equality than at any time since 1928.
I didn't actually get to see this but a friend in Stockholm told me there was an extensive series of tunnels underneath the City of Stockholm so that no neighborhood had to have a multi-lane highway going through it. Just the idea of being willing to spend tax money on underground highways so as to not impose that on anyone (in America, above-ground multi-lane highways would get imposed on poor neighborhoods) stunned me.
Visiting Sweden I couldn't help but think of American intellectual Cornell West. He has a phrase for our current American experience: "we have become well-adjusted to injustice." If Sweden represents the socialism that is so often derided back home in America, sign me up!
Related posts:
A Week in Sweden
There is No Need to Save Face in Sweden
Daydreaming at Stockholm City Hall
Visiting the Nobel Museum
The Swedish Tourist Attraction that Didn't Attract Me
Monday, February 7, 2011
What Idea(s) Captured Your Imagination in 2010?
The idea that really captured and shocked my imagination in 2010 was this: American women are not progressing politically as I would have expected in the early 21st Century. We currently rank 85th in the world for female representation. 85th!
African-Americans, after all, can rightly celebrate political progress. One hundred years after the founding of the NAACP, and 40 years after the civil rights era, America has a black President.
What about the progress of American women? Lulled by Hillary Clinton’s success in garnering 18 million votes for the Presidency and the addition of two new Supreme Court Justices, I hadn’t actually kept up with how far we as American woman have to go to equal the gains of women everywhere else in the world.
Out of 13,000 members of Congress
in our history,
only 2%
have been women.
~Name It, Change It.
Two things raised my consciousness in 2010. The first was a brand new organization founded by Gloria Steinem and Jane Fonda called ‘Name It, Change It’ that points out sexism toward female candidates in the media. I have written here about the stunning effect of seeing America’s media-generated sexism gathered and catalogued on a daily basis. It’s shocking.
If you are an American feminist of either gender, I’d like to ask you to join me in changing the world by “liking” this organization through Facebook. It has taught me a lot. There are still less than 1,460 people who “like” this group. You would be among the cutting-edge politically by doing so. Both my conservative and liberal friends have signed up and been shocked by how dismissively their female candidates have been treated.
Only 31 women
have ever served as Governor
compared with 2,317 men.
~Name It, Change It.
Here’s an example of what they taught me: scholar J.A. Schmitz's wrote an article highlighted through the website that pointed out that America’s system will not result in equal representation for females anytime soon. Why? Because our system is set up to give incumbents an advantage in reelection. Since 90% of incumbents are men, women are at an obvious disadvantage that could take years and years to overcome.
The beautiful Stockholm City Hall
Council Chambers
Being an expat has also allowed me to compare the American system with other countries' systems. When I was in Sweden, I asked the Swedish tour guide at Stockholm’s City Hall, “why is it your country has made such incredible progress in electing women?”
My Swedish tour guide told me, “what I have always been told is that in a system that directly elects representatives such as America’s, it practically requires millionaire-status to run for federal office. Because most women are devoting their prime years to running their families rather than making money, most millionaires happen to men. In Sweden, a parliamentary system favors those who do the work. Hence, more females are chosen and elected as representatives of their party.”
Parliamentary systems such as Sweden also lend themselves to quota systems that ensure more female representation. While women are just as underrepresented in cabinet offices in Iraq as American women, their new constitution requires political parties to fill quotas for female representation. I don’t believe in quotas, but I can’t help but think that this minimum level of female representation will be good for women and children in Iraq.
I'll admit, I’m discouraged by what I learned. I thought we would be farther by now. I had no idea how much farther we have to go.
What ideas have captured your imagination in 2010?
Related Posts:
Friday, February 4, 2011
The Swedish Tourist Attraction That Didn't Attract Me
During my week in Sweden, I could tell one aspect of Swedish culture that had wide appreciation among Swedes and foreigners alike was the Swedish monarchy. Recently, there was a royal wedding between the beautiful Princess Victoria and her physical fitness trainer Daniel Westling. Reportedly, their relationship was quite a love story warming the hearts of all lovers of fairy tales.
The Swedish Royal Palace gift shop was barely maneuverable due to tourists snapping up the merchandise related to this event. I noticed my complete lack of interest in this recent royal wedding - a reversal from my twenties.
Princess Diana and Prince Charles
When I was twenty-two years old, I fell head over heels for the fairy tale of my time: Prince Charles and Lady Diana. I delighted in every minute detail of the wedding planning. I could not consume enough pictures of every fabulous thing Lady Diana said, wore, or did. I got up at 3 a.m. to watch the entire ceremony. When I was married the following year, I asked my florist to reproduce EXACTLY the bouquet Diana had carried down the aisle.
Prince Charles and Lady Diana’s relationship all turned out to BE a fairy tale. In other words, a fictional story designed for public consumption that wasn’t true. It was merely good for business and marketing a nation. I feel naive and silly, in retrospect, for having expected that it should be otherwise. Royal marriages don’t even have a tradition of being about love.
This female fantasy women have of being a princess doesn’t even need to be projected onto a specific woman. There's a famous business legend about a guy hired to help the Walt Disney Company grow their business.
As the new consumer products division chief, Andrew Mooney attended his first "Disney on Ice" show. While waiting in line, he found himself surrounded by young girls dressed as princesses. “They weren’t even Disney products. They were generic princess products,” he mused. Soon after realizing the demand for all things princess-related, the Disney Princess line was formed. In 2009, that "Princess" division grossed an estimated $4 billion.
As a pure business proposition, the Swedes chip in under $2 a piece to support the royal family. For their $16 million, they get a photograph-able family that can generate publicity and interest in Sweden more than any prime minister could.
What I DO find myself attracted to in Swedish culture, is this group of people who have banded together to proclaim the idea of kings and queens a ridiculously outdated notion. You can read about their ideas here.
Think about it, if we as human beings have gotten rid of stupid ideas like serfs and slaves, why haven’t we yet rid ourselves of the obsolete notion (on the other end of the spectrum) that chosen human beings should serve as "Truman Show" figureheads above the rest of us?
Maybe women have a deep-seated need for princesses.
What is a princess? I would define her as a pampered girl, indulged in consumption unavailable to others due to her birth rather than her innovative ideas or labor. Her power isn’t exercised directly because she doesn’t, after all, have the responsibility to produce anything. Her job is merely to “be,” not to “do.” Why? Because by being fashionable, beautiful, and of high birth she's...worthy. Ick.
That's why we women fall for it...being deemed worthy. But why do we need hereditary monarchy to be any of those things. Why do we need to be a princess to be fashionable, beautiful, of acclaimed parentage, or worthy?
Can't get enough pictures
of Michelle Obama's dresses!
I'm not saying I don't turn into a girly-girl the minute Michelle Obama's State Dinner Dress photos come out. Hey, I am woman. I love pretty dresses. What got Michelle Obama there? The power and audacity of the ideas represented, not dated institutions that have outlived their Medieval existence.
I was bemused at yet another way I find Scandinavians to be global thought leaders. This group of Swedish people (called the Swedish Republican Association) made me think and I'd like you to think with me. If princesses didn't exist, what would young women dream of being? Could it likely be a healthier idea for humanity and relationships? A more realistic idea? Can you imagine people of the future laughing at us for even allowing the idea of undemocratic monarchies to exist? For needing the “idea” of princesses?
What would you dream of being if princesses didn't exist?
Monday, January 31, 2011
Visiting the Nobel Museum
Freezing yet Cheerful
I'm in Stockholm!
A scientist friend told me once that a Nobel Prize in Sciences was a dated concept. He said most breakthroughs require an ensemble, a team, and the idea of one guy toiling passionately for years in his lab until one day he says, "Eureka!" is overly dramatic. He felt it was not the likely way big discoveries will happen in the 21st century.
That may be, but I found, like most tourists, that visiting the Nobel Museum was #1 on my list of things to do in Stockholm. To me, the Nobel Prize represents goodness over evil, enlightenment over superstition, knowledge over anti-intellectualism, and excellence over mediocrity.
I respond to the innovation and thought leadership I see from the Scandinavian countries. Having figured out what works for their countries and developed themselves to the highest degree, as societies they seem free to operate as aristocrats who no longer have to worry about earning a living and can move on to higher, more noble concerns such as how to advance the human race. The Nobel Prize is just the most prominent example.
A beautiful reclining Buddha
displayed as part of an art exhibit
at the Nobel Museum
celebrating the philosophy
of the Dalia Lama
Beautiful and inspiring sentiments
on a garden bench
also part of the art exhibit
Sculpture formed out of
discarded Manhattan phone books
I loved not only seeing the art exhibit but the short movies about each Nobel Prize winner and the other movie about creative environments that breed innovation and excellence without apology. There wasn't an exhibit on how to raise a Nobel Prize winner. I suppose by the time people win, their parents aren't alive to celebrate with them and to be asked how they did it. That's probably not so important. I don't know about you, but I've always observed there is no shortage of worthy scientists, instead there's a shortage of funding for all their great work.
The Nobel Museum is in a stately old building set amidst Old Town Stockholm. I had to tease the front desk clerk that the big clock in the middle of the exhibit space was dead and not working in a building devoted to celebrating excellence. "I know, she grinned, we've tried for three years to get it to run properly. No luck." The irony made me smile. Maybe they should offer a prize.
Labels:
art,
Nobel prize,
Norway,
Sweden
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Daydreaming at Stockholm City Hall
Stockholm City Hall
photo by Yanlin Li
I can't think of anything in the world more prestigious than a Nobel Prize, can you? One of the great pleasures of being in Stockholm was to see the sites associated with the yearly Nobel Prize event. One of the places used to celebrate humanity's most illustrious achievements is Stockholm's City Hall.The Blue Hall
at Stockholm City Hall
Photo by Yanlin Li
I don't know why I find everything associated with the Nobel Prize deeply romantic, but I do. Probably because while the Prize goes to one person, you know that someone doesn't achieve something like that without incredible help and support. I found myself reacting to all of Stockholm's Nobel glory with schoolgirl wonder.
One night in Stockholm, I watched new members who were going to be inducted into the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences arrive at City Hall in their white tie and evening gowns. It was such a beautiful moment to see, knowing that this had to be one of the happiest moments of their lives. Bravo! Brava!
Now that I think about it, it wasn't just seeing Swedish scientists arrive for dinner and dancing that made it all seem so fanciful. I do know why I find it all so dreamily romantic.
I've always had a serious crush on CalTech scientist Richard Feynman who won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1965. Feynman would now be over 90 but he died in 1988. I think back to his wonderful essay "The Value of Science" which is so breathtakingly beautiful, it has the ability to make every humanities major question their choices.
I went through a period where I read every single book Richard Feynman wrote for a general audience. While I had never taken physics in school, his enthusiasm for the subject always made me realize "I am missing out somehow!" He had such a flair for showmanship when explaining physics. Most people remember him not for his Nobel Prize, but for explaining very simply, using only a glass of water on the table, how the Space Shuttle Challenger blew up.
One night in Stockholm, I watched new members who were going to be inducted into the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences arrive at City Hall in their white tie and evening gowns. It was such a beautiful moment to see, knowing that this had to be one of the happiest moments of their lives. Bravo! Brava!
Now that I think about it, it wasn't just seeing Swedish scientists arrive for dinner and dancing that made it all seem so fanciful. I do know why I find it all so dreamily romantic.
I've always had a serious crush on CalTech scientist Richard Feynman who won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1965. Feynman would now be over 90 but he died in 1988. I think back to his wonderful essay "The Value of Science" which is so breathtakingly beautiful, it has the ability to make every humanities major question their choices.
I went through a period where I read every single book Richard Feynman wrote for a general audience. While I had never taken physics in school, his enthusiasm for the subject always made me realize "I am missing out somehow!" He had such a flair for showmanship when explaining physics. Most people remember him not for his Nobel Prize, but for explaining very simply, using only a glass of water on the table, how the Space Shuttle Challenger blew up.
The Swedish Flag
Hanging in the Blue Hall
More Swedish Pride
The Blue Hall is the largest room in Stockholm City Hall and it is most famous for being used every year for the Nobel banquet every December 10th. Every year 1,300 people squeeze themselves into this beautiful space with just 40 inches of space between them. So what if you have to eat with your elbows close to your sides, this is one of the most exclusive invitations on Earth, no?
Table service for the Nobel Dinner
Two beautiful bas relief sculptures
in the Prince's Hall
within Stockholm City Hall
where receptions are held year round.
These window sculptures
overlook the harbor and a
terrace about as European and romantic
as terraces can get.
The Golden Hall
at Stockholm City Hall
where laureates go to dance.
Isn't it fabulous?
Photo by Yanlin Li
The Golden Hall at Stockholm City Hall is done with a beautiful golden mosaic that could best be described as Picasso's Byzantine Period. Picasso didn't have a Byzantine period, you say? I know. But if he did, this is what it would look like.
What? You say your City Hall
back home isn't quite this cool?
Yeah, same here.
The architect gave the artist a mere two years to finish the entire job, something the mosaic master felt would take at least 6 or 7 to do properly. One of the very fun stories the tour guide relates is pointing out a headless Swedish patriot at the top of one mosaic, surrounded by equally headless friends.
"Why Mr. Artist, did your patriot get put up there on the wall minus his head?"
The artist said, "well, that's due to him having lost his head to the enemy in battle. I didn't portray him with his entire body and head, but left the head off as he lost it in service to his country."
"Yes, but Mr. Artist, why then are there a couple other characters without their heads at exactly the point where the wall meets the ceiling? Could it be you forgot that there would be 4 to 5 feet of benches at the base of the wall and the entire mosaic was raised 5 feet?" Ouch.
One would never pick these mistakes out on one's own - or even want to, actually. It's the Swedish strength and ability to laugh at themselves, that makes these very human tours possible.
Oh, and look what I found. Richard Feynman dancing in white tie during his Nobel weekend. That is one lucky girl.
Richard Feynman and his wife Gweneth Howarth
1965
Photo from the CalTech Archives
Labels:
American people,
architecture,
art,
Nobel prize,
Sweden
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)